all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
  • [–] 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Holy overzealous NSFW tag, Batman! 🤦🏻😆

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Nah. Unnecessarily blurred (or, in the case of some user/client settings, completely hidden) posts are a nuisance.

    Especially for something as innocuous as three letters of text.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    I don't think anyone will suffer if they don't see this (mildly interesting) post because they have chosen to hide nsfw content. I think anyone who decides to hide nsfw stuff has only themselves to blame if they miss the most interesting stuff.

    I find this "don't censor obscenities here, whe're not on F*c*book" mentality just as annoying as the censoring itself. If you don't like the way someone is writing, don't read it. There are millions of other posts for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

    No, the thing I mean is much worse. I don't dare saying it's name, but it's a social network by **rk *uckerber*

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    And if we're still both 32 bits dating, instead of getting married into 64 bits, we'll have some problems in January 2038...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    How did people reproduce before that?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago*

    Depends on your time zone. It would still be new years eve in the US.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    If someone who had conceived on 1 Jan 1970 they would be born around end of Aug / beginning of Sept, and be 56 years old

  • source