top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 59 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 46 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Nah the wealthiest people aren't on the list, and they are much wealthier than any of these guys. The family of Saud is way up there but keep most of their wealth hidden.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 49 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They're a big family though, none of which have more than Musk INDIVIDUALLY.

    You'd be right about Putin and other despots with de facto one person ownership of entire countries worth of wealth and resources, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yes if you think what they report officially is correct. Most everyone is aware they only report a small fraction of their wealth. Musk is by far not the first trillionair, he is the first one publicly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The wealth gap was already so heinously egregious in 2016 too.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Remember occupy wallstreet? The wealth inequality in 2006-2007 was so bad there were tons of videos going around exposing with easily verifiable information about just how much more money the 1 percent had than everyone else. Then the recession happened and then suddenly when you went back to look at that information it had been cleaned up to make it look like the 1 percent didn't really own that much more. I think it was right around the time that Google dropped "don't be evil"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago

    Looks like buying Twitter was a great investment. Being able to change the outcome of an election definitely beats ad revenue.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Don't forget Bezos had a 2 for 1 split when he got divorced.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Sorry that it's a youtube link, but this is a brilliant analysis from Gary Stevenson with pretty sobering conclusions... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gd0gmxd36FI

    Basically at this point the continyed concentration of wealth is increasing exponentially as a logical inevitability.

    We need wealth taxes, breakup of monopolies and a far larger willingness of the population to boycot companies that prioritise short term growth and unethical business practices over the delivery of effective, repairable products and honest services for fair prices.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    This is the fucking hilarious part of inflation.

    Yeah. There’s more money. And nobody has it except a handful of scum.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    "Libertarians" and BaSiC eCoNoMiCs guys blame inflation on "printing money," but they don't like to talk about who the printed money went to, which is the real problem. Wall Street and big corporate was bailed out in 2008, that's where the expanded money supply was concentrated into.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    To continue…and liberals don’t like to talk about how capitalism requires the theft of wealth from the working class via surplus value and that in order to get rid of this class subjugation and oppression we need to get rid of the system that breeds it - capitalism. The workers need to take back the very thing that is oppressing them - the means of production/private property. When in private hands it benefits the private individuals. When in the hands of the working class - it benefits all….and the formerly bourgeois class are absorbed into the working class (aka there are no more classes)….which is the thing they fear most. This is why they teach you to parrot anti-communist propaganda through all of their propaganda channels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    The problem still seems to be governance. Like even in that system some of the workers are involved in regulating the infrastructure of production and that necessarily means that one person is telling a lot of people what they can and can't do. We don't really have a way to do this that doesn't involve hierarchy. And our little monkey brains love a hierarchy.

    So that's the real problem of communism. Because otherwise it is a better system and it should beat capitalism. Unfortunately because capitalism is better at concentrating resources into fewer hands it's better at defending itself from fairer systems.

    Also the US having had little physical damage after ww2 meant that the capitalist had a much better base from which to perpetuate itself.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    A lifetime ago I heard that "inflation is good actually, because it allows for economic mobility" as in people without a lot of money get more of the "new" money and so get to join the "middle class" (not a real class, but an income bracket).

    Turns out the rich plugged up that little leak in tiny bit of wealth that actually did trickle down.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    We had a wealth gap between the poor and rich, and now we're getting a wealth gap between the rich and super rich?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Pulling more Luigis could stop them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    You'd have to create a threat linked to the money, so that Luigis went after anyone who kept their inheritance or dared to keep the wealth consolidated.

    Eventually, someone would disseminate the money to survive.

    On a related note, someone needs to hunt down private equity brokers and unethical venture capitalists the way Nazi hunters went after escaped Nazi officers after WWII, either to Luigi them or to bring them to international tribunal. Although, since nations can be influenced by ultra-wealthy oligarchs, it might not be possible to form such a tribunal. And that brings us back to the frontier justice of goomba-stomping plumbers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    !twnw@fedia.io their wealth must be taxed. It's not even an issue of "can we survive without a wealth tax" but "how long". These people are gluttons and will never stop hoarding.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago*

    More like 5 biggest criminals

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Way to hang in there Mr bezos

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    how is dell in the top 5? Seriously though only buffet at least has the financial accumen to actually be there. Decades of lowering taxes has made it so that even if you lose bilions like musk did you still won't lose your fortune. Its barely a rounding curve for him.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Not until we kill them all

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Well at least elon is no longer a trillionaire.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    how can this be possible!? it almost looks like they printed an enormeous amount of money extra! this cant be true, else devaluation of the dollar would be immense! (/cynical)

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Capitalism is inherently expansionist.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Not just capitalism, but every human system almost, will have those in power--by whatever philosophy--to continue to expand their power until things start to break down/heads start rolling.

    There's temptation to think we're living in a unique point of history, but we're just the fresh turn of the wheel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    The point of criticizing capitalism is to address the inherent flaws in the current system, and to supplant it with a different system that inherently limits the wealth/power of the people at "the top" of it (or if there even could be a "top").

    It definitely is a unique point in history as well, even if it rhymes with previous points and we're still humans all along.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    You're espousing a fantasy future permanent utopia, a common article of faith among progressives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    It all depends on people who are working in their companies. If they stop working in their companies the wealth will fade away.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Nice to see some people are doing fine in this economy.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    anyway getting more from 2026 ?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›