The language used in the entire thing is so off putting. Like they really really want you to believe is for the children. Also, the first country in the world that won't allow children to share pictures of themselves nude? I had to chuckle at that (to be clear, I think children should not operate devices unattended to avoid stuff like this, but that should be parenting, not daddy government)
post
How? How will they do this?
Oh, an always on, always watching government mandated app connecting to a centralized government server?
For the kids!
And suddenly nudity becomes pornography.
And also, looking at one's own body becomes something looking a lot like a sin one should not commit.
I suppose the next logical step will be the reintroduction Victorian-like anti 'self-abuse' devices for young people? Have fun, kids
What a wonderful world we're building.
No parent should have to worry that giving their child a smartphone opens the door to abuse and exploitation.
Yes they should be. They should be extremely worried about that. They should be fucking parents and handle it. Not have big daddy government do it for them.
The subtitle on that page is so arrogantly ignorant.
Hah yeah, "impossible". I bet it will take 60 seconds after w/e Google and Apple do rolls out, for some kid to bypass it. From which, 60 more seconds for every other kid to learn how, from that kid.
And it won't even solve the big harms that kids experience from tech. It won't solve cyber bullying! It won't solve the disinformation firehose. It won't solve sextortion schemes. It won't solve doxing. It won't solve social media destroying their feeling of self worth. It won't solve swatting. It won't solve ANY of that shit.
I don't care if kids see porn. They'll live.
Stop fucking with adults and blaming that goal.
My ex exposed our kids to porn and it seriously messed with one of them. More than a year of counselling and they were still never the same. Only took until adulthood that they could really process it. Some kids I would imagine may unalive themselves over it if the level of depression and anxiety my kid went through is anything to go by.
I'm also a child sexual abuse survivor and was also exposed to porn as a kid and had issues because of it. It also took until adulthood for me to work through my sexual trauma and come to a place of mostly peace. But I am not likely to ever be 100% (even with the therapy I've had).
Porn has only gotten more extreme over time with some seriously fucked up shit.
So no, they may not survive and if they do, they don't always come out of it mentally unscathed.
Porn exposure to kids is a form of sexual abuse and should be taken just as seriously.
may unalive themselves
Oh please stop that. We are not Tiktok here.
And it depends on the kid, the kind of porn they see (bdsm, skat) and how enlightened the kid is, that porn is not like reality.
I'm going to need more details. Everyone saw it as a kid. Like wtf were these people seeing that caused trauma? I could see ut being traumatizing if maybe it was CSAM or something.
Sure I'll bite about what was a fucking awful time in our lives. I don't know they saw because my kid was so traumatised they were unable to speak specifics. But they were able to draw some of it which I am not going to put in detail here for what should be obvious reasons. But it wasn't vanilla that's for sure. To adults, I'm sure it would be fine. To a kid it would look like violent abuse.
But hey, what would a fucking child abuse survivor and parent of a a kid who also suffered abuse know. Ffs, I thought I escaped Reddits gas lighting of abuse survivors and ignorance of academic studies which show the same.
I'm done with this convo.
what a nothing reply. Normally when people have strong convictions about something genuine they're pretty transparent in their reasons. yours reads like generic exaggerated emotional manipulation with no actual substance to me. God forbid you get called out and asked to explain your horseshit eh? everybody else is the abuse enabler and your the perpetual victim poor you buddy.
your done with this convo because you have nothing to offer and can't take criticism and if I'm being honest that's a you problem
We feel mirror manufacturers should be held accountable for reflecting nudity by, of, from, or to minors.
I will not co-parent with the government. The Epstein class suddenly cares about the safety and well being of children? I don't think so.
I'm pretty sure big tech already had access to all of your pictures, and I don't think this means the UK government will gain access, they don't even know what to do with it anyway.
I mean they explicitly say it should be done in a way so that no data leaves the device.
They're asking for something that will most likely require some server interaction, and can be modified to include more things the government doesn't like (mostly if Farage takes power at some point). It would be insane to think this is all well and good.
Plus, I'm wondering how you do it without data leaving the device. All I can think of is an AI model that willl process every picture. You can't compare to known hashes, b/c it's a novel picture out of the camera. The device has to judge it somehow.
If there's an AI model, you'll have false positives and false negatives. And gray areas, where even reasonable humans would disagree. Since false negatives are way more legally risky, co's will err waaaaaaaay on the side of false positives. Which will block totally innocent pics. And gender diffs in what's socially accepted, and the AI will get that wrong a lot.
Gonna be a mess.
all 25 comments