top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 258 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 244 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    A port made entirely of air? Who do you think I am, some kind of idiot?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    No, it's Japanese so the port side is on the right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Fun fact! The literal translation of airport in Japanese is 'sky harbour'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Introducing the new Apple AirPort

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Sometimes you come up with a genius idea only to realize you've reinvented the train.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I think you are thinking of belt loaders, which have a long flat bed on them.

    Except, BAM - it’s not a flat bed, it’s a moving conveyor belt that is raised to carry the bags and cargo from those carts into the plane.

    Unless you’re thinking of something else. But I think you’re thinking of something like this:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 121 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Clearly designed by someone who hasn't used a pickup truck to it's real potential.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Yeah, this isn't rocket surgery

    Also, yay for an actual work truck, and not one of the weird oversize impractical monstrosities that so many people seem to swoon over these days

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    not one of the weird oversize impractical monstrosities that so many people seem to swoon over these days

    I heard a real kicker recently. It was something like

    My truck looks like it shouldn't be able to haul it but it can. Yours like it should be able to but can't.

    Best instagram roast of a modern truck guy I've ever seen.

    They were arguing on a post about that guy's massive grocery getter where he was defending the purchase, as usual.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 72 points 1 month ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 68 points 1 month ago (5 children)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 65 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Then you could add forklift forks and you have a sideloader!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 59 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    It may be because a large enough load could quickly block the driver's left-side mirror.

    Oooh, another thing is that a heavy enough load may imbalance the vehicle enough to make it unsafe on turns.

    Anyone see anything else?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, non uniform suspension or adaptive suspension might be important.

    Probably not a good idea for 70 miles per hour but it might be a kick ass farm truck

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 31 points 1 month ago

    Yard trucks are just a minor evolution away

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Probably bad aerodynamic. Don't they use something like that on the airport? Since they don't drive far, aerodynamics are probably not that important.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You joke but this is basically what a vintage British Bus looks like, except the non-cab side is for the Engine.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It would "work", but it would be aerodynamically unstable so would be limited to low speeds (<~25mph). This is why this configuration is quite common in construction/industry site machinery, where high speeds are unnecessary and unsafe.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    I used to work at a furniture factory and we got all our steel delivered in a truck with this configuration. 8m and 10m lengths on the shortest possible wheelbase. No backseat though.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Because the steering wheel is on the wrong side.

    Source: 'Merica!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    That's one of the few things where the US actually follows most of the world!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 1 month ago
    [–] 11 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    Cybertruck designer here: Just had a huge whipper (subscription based), some dishwasher style metal pannels, and we can sell these babies for 200k.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Looks very similar to our yard mules

    Beautifully silly

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Don't you hate it when you have a genius idea, only to find out someone else thought of it long ago? Nice try, Einstein. Back to the sandbox.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›