top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 150 points 2 months ago (1 child)

It’s crazy how treason is just a game now

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Unemployed losers will do anything for attention

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 124 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Cowards like Andrew Tate won't go anywhere near the actual front, they are all about a fake image of being strong while being being pathetic cowardly losers.


    This is a really fun post however, but made me think....

    Killing Tate in combat can be a bad idea, it could easily make him a martyr, a powerful symbol for other cowards to rally behind.

    However, if the last pictures of Tate were somehow really embarrassing to him and his followers...

    On the toilet perhaps, in the middle of the night, being half awake, hair and beard a mess, wearing a way too old t-shirt with large holes and stains.

    That might do it...

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Killing Tate in combat can be a bad idea, it could easily make him a martyr, a powerful symbol for other cowards to rally behind.

    However, if the last pictures of Tate were somehow really embarrassing to him and his followers…

    What happened to Charlie Kirk?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 63 points 2 months ago*

    Him being a martyr would be less of an issue than him being an living promoter of his worldview.

    This hand wringing about awful people becoming martyrs is frustrating to read. How many horrible people have become actual martyrs who inspire people to be worse than the followers they had while living? Actually martyrs tend to die doing things that benefit people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Running scared across a minefield, leg gets blown off and dies slowly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The issue is still that it would be dying in combat.

    All his supporters could start using the argument that he was a true man, who never backed down from a fight, "he even went to war" would be a common claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    i heard that, at least couple years back, rich people, well-positioned people, some influencers etc who nevertheless got drafted sometimes get an option to be a drone pilot in bars-kaskad unit. drone pilots are some of high priority targets, and now ukrainian drones reach like, 50km behind the frontline. in general drones can fly thousands of kilometers to worthy target, and targeting tate would be very funny. on the other hand, i'm not sure how would trump or other republicans react to that, he already got him out of romanian prison

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    If russia plays it smart. They would not send Tate anywhere near actual combat or standard military. Just some PR stunts with him and trying to make him look "badass".

    If russia doesn't play it smart then considering it's russian military and Tate is western. He would get hazed to or near death or maybe executed by some military official.

    If Tate would even survive. Ukrainian troops would find him in fetal position and crying in a ditch

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    However, if the last pictures of Tate were somehow really embarrassing to him and his followers…

    now that you say that, russians must have some crazy strong kompromat on him

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Globally they are the promoters of the sort of ideas he pushes, matched only by american far right. And there is not many places for them to run, which would be acceptable to their fans and wouldent prosecute them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 2 months ago*

    Shooting stuff at the gun range is like the most easy part of "army training".

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 2 months ago

    I would love to see Andrew Tate's head exploded by a drone.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    What training? Russian grunts get no training, they get threatened with rape and/or murder by their CO if they object to being used as target practice for Ukrainian drone operators.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Hypothetically speaking, how much time spent at a training camp is necessary for one to be categorized as a military target / enemy combatant? I don't know how the conventions work.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Essentially, as soon as you have signed a contract to join a nation's armed forced as a combatant, you are one and can be fought as such. Generally speaking you can be engaged in all contexts unless you are actively doing three things: surrendering, bailing out of a plane using a parachute as an emergency(not dropping as part of a paratrooper assault) or if you are in the process of being rescued from a shipwreck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    True for targetted assassinations but anyone on the training/military grounds is a valid target as it's not like you can go review their each individual contracts to confirm this. You just destroy the entire base that spawns orcs into your lands.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    Even targeted strikes on individual combatant (generals and other officers) are not considered war crimes. If you have enough reason to think that a person is an enemy combatant (they carry weapons and are dressed in the uniform of a belligerent enemy nation) you may engage them specficically.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    They will never get send to the front, they will be used for propaganda to undermine the next US election. Lots of chuds in the US becoming 18 this year who will listen to these two cunts.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Don't they sexually assault their new recruits?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    This is the best thing they've ever done.

    You think they have the advertising IDs turned off on their phones? Or nah?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    The taint brothers

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    God, it's as if I thought I had reached peak disdain for these cunts but they have more to give.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago
    [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Maybe we should fundraise for some face recognition drones for the Ukrainians? 🤔

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Steven Seagal waddles over with a watermelon

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    They might the first ones to get training in a couple years. Aren't they just scooping people up and feeding them directly into drone bombs nowadays?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    Maybe they'll become heroes for "gun rights"... like Charlie Kirk.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    At which point exactly did "gun-posing for your insta" become "army training"?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Ah yes, the famed Russian army's training.

    How many wars has Russia actually won?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You guys are getting training?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›