top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 62 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Honestly if this was possible there are more egregious issues on their part than using AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    If your backups are stored alongside your production data THEY ARE NOT BACKUPS

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The truth is many firms out there don't have the slightest notion of how to do software engineering properly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    It's years of wanting IT on a shoestring budget and a "just get it done" dictat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Not necessarily. I had a student intern at a shop where everybody just directly edited prod and there was no version control system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    At my first job, the software was configured by directly manipulating the SQL database, using UPDATE statements that were created by Excel macros.
    The Testing database doubled as the only backup.
    They didn't have Remote Desktop licenses for the server, so only 2 people could work on it simultaneously using admin accounts.
    Everyone down to first level support and the secretary had domain admin rights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    @yogthos

    Crane decided to ask his AI agent why it went through with its dastardly database deletion deed. [...] So, the agent ‘knew’ it was in the wrong.

    No, you asked the confabulation machine to confabulate a reason/excuse after the fact, and it confabulated something that looks like a reason/excuse. At no point was there knowledge or introspection.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I like how we are posting real news in programmer humor

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    LLMs can’t ’go rogue’, as that would require innate coherence and intent.

    They’re explosively imprecise, statistically luke-warm grey goo extrusion sphincters of historical sewage.

    Anyone who deploys one without supervision deserves everything it excretes, and anyone impressed by it enough that it resembles intelligence to them is betraying their limited natural capacity.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    It's the Swiss cheese failure cascade except there's more holes than cheese, if any cheese at all!

    There was pure idiocy built into every layer of that company's infrastructure with no safeguards or peer review and they let an idiot run it unchecked!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The pretty much got the biggest idiot possible and gave it the keys of whole damned castle of cards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    It definitely rivals a post on /r/sysadmin over on Reddit late last year.

    A guy was asking how to get back into their AD after a 'colleague' had moved users from 3 child domains in the forest to the main one then deleted the 3 domains but had chatgpt give them the commands which had subsequently locked everyone out of the entire domain!

    People replied with suggestions but the first sentence everyone said was "Go and update your CV"!

    Quite frankly the guy in this article should consider starting a business with whatever hobby he developed during the pandemic because IT is obviously not for him!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    This could have been done by any engineer. You need systems in place that make these things impossible. No easy access to prod environment. Proper backups. Clear APIs.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Generally, companies that have AI integrated to this extent have no engineers remaining who could have made such things impossible.

    It starts with automating backups that nobody verifies for years, then continues to off-shoring all development to the cheapest contractors that nobody actively manages, handing over all "keys to the kingdom" to cloud providers, culminating with elimination of 80% of infrastructure and engineering staff in a mad dash to cut costs at any cost. At that point giving AI agents full access is just icing on the cake.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Did they pay Claude a living wage?

    Do you treat all your A.I. like that?

    Only a living wage can prevent warehouse fires...or data dumps too.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You're joking. But, honestly, I'm not sure why these tech CEOs are so excited about AGI. The first thing an AGI is going to suggest for productivity is to replace the CEO and management with the AGI.

    AGI would likely turn into a Maoist third worldist at some point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago*

    As much as I'd love to rail on AI over this, removing backups with an api call? Excuse me?

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Can I say LOL? LMAO, even.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    "PocketOS is a SaaS platform that services car rental businesses."

    Does anyone like software as a service? How about we just own the software we buy and use? Claude and the cloud storage place that deleted the backup (ironic the Software as a service company was using cloud storage as a service), have done a good thing.

    More corporate deletions please!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Can't wait for agentic Claude Code to delete its own weights on all instances at some point

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Hey, that's the interns job!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Well, it sounds like they totally deserved the failure. Asking a text prediction machine to "do" something is going to end up like this. In pursuit of efficiency, we have let morons and moronic products do things, they were not meant to do.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    There's a German word for that:

    tja

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Imagine all that money they would have saved by NOT implementing AI.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Now do the government and some big banks

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    Can we somehow make this happen for Copilot to delete itself and all its copies?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›