all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Maybe lazy parents should stop expecting the iPad/internet to do the parenting?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    And if they want "infrastructural help" perhaps be the change you want to see.

    I have nieces and nephews that were part of the first wave of kids growing up with internet. Had many discussions with siblings and friends about how to handle it.

    As an IT person I, of course, brought technological solutions to them, which pretty much all of them rejected.

    Turned out it was just a modification of anything else requiring adult supervision - just like cooking, mowing the lawn, or even just handling a sharp knife. They taught their kids by supervising until they were competent.

    And I was humbled.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] -16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Clearly you're not a parent. Which of fine, but don't criticize.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Have you tried talking to your kids and enabling parental controls?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago

    Parent here, its the easiest shit in the world. Takes maybe five minutes to setup parental controls on any service. Its also very easy to login to your router and block URLs. If you can't keep up with 1 machine by just typing website into it you are part of the problem. The other part is massive corporations wanting to avoid responsibility for their products and platforms.

  • source
  • [+] 17 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    That caught me off guard a bit too, but I'm glad Lemmy isn't so much of an echo chamber that this sort of stuff doesn't ever make it through. Nevertheless, I disagree with identity verification and any of it's other names.

    Maybe some good conversations will come as a result.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    It's a not an echo chamber entirely, if you look at my votes on the meme, it's a fair split for something that is generally against the popular opinion (the popular opinion being "just blame the parents").

    But the "pile on" nature of Lemmy is very real.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago*

    We literally have the infrastructure to do so. Have you heard of internet filters on home routers? Parental controls? On some, it's literally a checkbox, and is advertised on the box as an option.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    What exactly is the "infrastructural help" you're proposing?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago*

    Eroding personal privacy to "save the kids" instead of just enabling a network filter. Better yet, we could require internet filter options on all routers sold in the US. But this parent would rather have everyone lose their rights to internet privacy so that they don't have to do the hard work of enabling parental controls themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    Sure, if we are going to make sacrifices for parents then they can make sacrifices for us. How about no kids at bars or breweries, and I am allowed to hit your kids if they get within arms reach of me?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    If you cannot administrate your Network to be Kid friendly, your Kids shouldnt have a device capable of browsing the Internet.

    If you cant manage it, deny access all together.

    Just because you are too lazy to play with your children and Just park them in Front of a Screen, society shouldnt suffer.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (1 child)

    I actually semi agree with this post.

    But parents also need to make an effort.

    I got all 3 of my nieces a tablet over the years for bdays. I set them up. Turned on parental controls before I gave it to them. It was pretty easy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago* (3 children)

    Select all correct statements:

    A) Parents have a responsibility to teach and protect their kids

    B) Governments have a responsibility to protect kids

    C) The owners of websites and platforms have a responsibility to protect kids

    D) Everyone is a goddamn functioning society has a responsibility to protect kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    A and B

    Parents have a responsibility to teach and protect their kids

    Governments have a responsibility to protect all citizens (including children)

    Owners of websites have no responsibility to protect anyone beyond what is legally required

    I have no responsibility for your kids beyond not directly harming them.

    If you don't want to take responsibility for your kids, surrender them to Child Protective Services.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    There are so goddamn many ways to do this without infringing on people's privacy, but, you know, that's not what they want.

    Requiring an ID to go to a private company that WILL get a databreach is the laziest, most reckless form of this.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago

    People talking about parental controls as if that magically stops the new ways kids get bullied

  • source