[–] 9 points 1 month ago

I'm sorry, but at no time during the application or interview process was I ever asked to present certification of either a brain or nervous system. Nor was such a requirement explicitly itemized in the job listing.

I will cc'ing HR for any further discussion on the matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

    Am I the only one that thinks that physical assault isn't okay even if it's directed at a guy who has a religion that you don't like?

  • source
  •  

    I just watched a YouTube video about the false narrative that there is a Gen Z revival in American Churches. https://youtu.be/l7Y-AF-Zt0Y. I've long been very interested in how Religion and Culture interact, and I'm sure YouTube knows that and fed me this video because if that.

    What I found very interesting is at the end of the video the guy pitches raising money for his humanist church community center. I'm old enough to remember (and participated in) the rapid ramp up of the non-denom movement in the 90's and 00's. I can't tell you how many "We've outgrown our building" fund raising drives I've seen in my life. That's literally what he is pitching. 😂

    This dude literally is the same guy as every one of those non-denom church planters. (If I'm willing to be generous) He's a young, talented, ambitious guy with a real dream to help build communities for people. Good for him. (If I'm more cynical, then I know his kind too.)

    But, even generously, he's falling for the exact same trap all of the non-denom church planters fall for. If his private community center (or another like it) attracts enough growth, then it will become attractive to corrupt people. That's a given. 100% going to happen.

    I just find it so fascinating to see this cycle happen all over again, literally repeating the exact same language. (I don't know the guy and don't know if he just doesn't know what he's doing, or if he knows good and well what he's doing. Could be either.)

    (I don't at all disagree with the thesis of his video. I've been an active Christian my whole life and it's really obvious there is not any kind of contemporary revival going on. )

     

    I'm constantly amazed that scouts isn't more popular with families. I'm a huge supporter of the whole worldwide program (particularly Scouting America and the Girl Scouts in the US).

    Yes, let's all acknowledge that there were past abuses that the Boy Scouts ignored and covered up. But, primarily due to the lawsuits associated with those abuses, Scouting America has instituted a lot of really strong child protection policies that arguably make it the safest youth program anywhere.

    It's a really great, comparatively cheap, program that offers amazing opportunities to kids and families.

    If you find yourself having trouble making friends as an adult, I really recommend looking into it.

     

    Okay you are ready to take a stand for freedom!

    You are going to use an OS that isn't going to bend the knee and comply with age verification laws. I solute you, comrade!

    Here are the likely consequences of your choice:

    The Feds aren't coming after you. You aren't going to be out on a watch list.

    What will likely happen is that if you try to log into your Facebook account you will get a message that says "Your Operating System is not currently supported. Your user experience will be limited to Groups labeled "Everyone"."

    That's basically it. Your personal user experience will be limited to "kid friendly" areas of the Internet. (Same with apps and games.)

    That's the real driver of these laws. Facebook and other app producers know that the days where they can just shrug off child predators using their products is coming to and end. Regardless of your opinion on age verification is as a solution, child predators are a real world problem and it's not just the parents fault. The platforms have some responsibility too.

    Which is exactly what Facebook and the others specifically don't want -responsibility for their own platforms. That's why they are pushing for these laws that off load their responsibility onto the OS makers. Then they can just say "Oh, we don't have any responsibility for this child being abused in our platform. We asked the OS what the user's age was and the OS reported 18+. What else could we have done?"

    So, that's the consequence if you choose to use an OS that refuses to comply. You'll just be relegated to the kid friendly version of website, games, and applications.

    (On the other hand, if your OS chooses to falsely report to a website or an app an age for a child that is abused, then the OS should also be held responsible. But at that point you can go ahead and blame the parents too for letting their child use an OS that isn't safe for them to use.)

    view more: next ›