New York just proposed the most invasive state-level age verification bill the US has seen. Senate Bill S08102 would extend age verification requirements down to the device itself: internet-connected devices, operating system providers, and app stores would all be required to implement what the bill calls “age assurance” before users can access their own hardware and software ecosystems.

Edit:

Meta is one of the lobbyists for the age verification bill.

Into the Metaverse: The Money and Motivations Behind Meta’s App Store Gambit

In May 2025, Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and Representative John James (R-MI) introduced the App Store Accountability Act (ASAA), a bill that would require app stores to verify users’ ages and obtain parental consent for users under 18. Meta has bankrolled a wildly expensive lobbying campaign to enact ASAA and its state-level analogs, and instead of recoiling in horror at taking kid privacy advice from Meta, some lawmakers are credulously going along with it.

Confirmed by Bloomberg : Meta Clashes With Apple, Google Over Age Check Legislation

The struggle has pitted Meta Platforms Inc. and other app developers against Apple Inc. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google, the world’s largest app stores. Lobbyists for both sides are moving from state to state, working to water down or redirect the legislation to minimize their clients’ risks.

This year alone, at least three states — Utah, Texas and Louisiana — passed legislation requiring tech companies to authenticate users’ ages, secure parental consent for anyone under 18 and ensure minors are protected from potentially harmful digital experiences. Now, lobbyists for all three companies are flooding into South Carolina and Ohio, the next possible states to consider such legislation.

in addition, there are Over 50 Child Advocacy Groups Unite to Demand App Store Accountability

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 161 points 5 months ago (20 children)

... I really don't want to have to stop using all fucking technology now. Ffs this is absolutely disgustingly absurd. EVERYTHING GETS HACKED I am not tying my ID and real name to literally everything I do on an electronic device...

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • load more comments (19 replies)
    [–] 101 points 5 months ago (41 children)

    Parents can age check their kids manually. We should not identify every user on the internet.

  • source
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • load more comments (41 replies)
    [–] 93 points 5 months ago

    We're going to PROTECT Children by Arresting Epstein's Associates! NOT Bombing Schools! Arresting ANY Pedophile in the Epstein Files! Making the BEST Childhood Vaccines available! having Jeffrey Epstein's Friend Peter Thiel track Adults!

  • source
  • [–] 64 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Lobbying remains more powerful than carefully considered debate.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    I can't believe all of you who are opposed to this.

    Won't you think of the poor data brokers who's entire library of intimate personal details about every person who's ever used a smartphone is practically worthless without the ability to link it to your actual identity.

    Screw the children, think of the shareholders you monsters.

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    This is a clearly coordinated attack on the civilians to get more data to sell and spy on them.

    This isn't a coincidence that these bills pop around at the same time.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 54 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Woah. Crazy how governments around the world are all doing this in lock-step.

    It's almost like we're all being ruled by a handful of families haha.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 35 points 5 months ago

    "Child advocacy groups", funded by billionaires.

    If you can't see it, you need to peel back a few more layers.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago

    before users can access their own hardware

    So the New yorkers can't buy computers and mobile phones anymore.

    So what.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago

    Fucking cockroaches

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago

    This is a good example for how democracy under capitalism tends to serve the interests of the Epstein class above the rest of us.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Weren't the red hats the ones bitching about "the nanny state"?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 22 points 5 months ago

    My head is going to explode

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago

    Politicians who unwaveringly support The King of the Pedophiles and a serial rapist think want me to believe they're "protecting the children."

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Children aren’t purchasing their devices, adults are, so why would an adult need to prove that they’re over 18? They can just state that the individual receiving the device is under 18…. Oh so you’re saying it’s not actual about the safety of children?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Christian fundie groups trying to get rid of porn on the web. Other groups seeking to eliminate anonymity from the web.

    Meta is likely going along with it because it protects them from child vulnerability lawsuits.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 17 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Go back to do everything on paper. No more invoice through email and payment. Demand everything comes on paper. Pay cash. It drives corpos and administration crazy to go back to old school systems. It'll probably do more than complain.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    Hell, let's go one step further and force it on the user level:
    Every time you want to access an online service, a government-appointed doctor comes to your house and does an X-ray of your clavicle to determine bone ossification, dental examinations, and a DNA methylation test to determine your biological age.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 5 months ago

    I hope Mamdani and friends oppose this piece of shit. It exists to erase sexuality that doesn't belong to the straight white dude, alongside filling the pockets of the wealthy by watching our every move.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, because those devices have age-inappropriate content already pre-installed amirite???

    Honestly though, how the fuck do they keep justifying the mental gymnastics behind this, from a judicial standpoint? If you were to never set a foot on the internet after buying the device, there's no need for age verification; and even if you do, as long as you don't visit any site that hosts inappropriate content, it still doesn't warrant an age verification.

    It's up to the content platform to ensure that no child visits inappropriate content. Think about it: a store IDs a person when they try to buy alc/tobacco, NOT when they just enter the store.

    I can't believe this passes legislation just like that.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Fuck these oligarchs trying to solve a parenting problem with technology and eroding everyone's privacy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    Yay! More places where devs will just say you can't run their stuff.

    I'm pretty sure I don't need to use anything built by a company so preoccupied with my birthday.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›