Whatever they find is inadmissible, if there truly wasn't a warrant.

Too sumarize the article:

US clickbait and ad infested news website directly quotes "trust me bro" Twitter post + describes in 2 sentences what a ramdisk is and does zero real "journalism" like maybe contacting mentioned dutch authorities or Windscribe themselfs.

Once again: Ban Tom's Slopware. Post the original source instead.

What authorities exactly? How did they get their hands on these servers without being let in? Do they have a response to this all being put on twitter? Even the article doesn't mention reaching out to "Dutch authorities" for comment, in a great journalistic failure to clarify anything.

Got it, do not use IT services in Denmark Netherlands.

To what end? What authority? At this point it could be you or me in a mask with a body cam, for all the credentials authorities are showing these days.

Spoiler: it was a random thief in need of hardware.

RAM disks alone will not be enough; the law enforcement can literally freeze the DRAM for forensics.

There's that legal jargon that comes to mind, fishing expedition

Free advertising for Windscribe if their claims are true. Also a lot of people in the thread spreading fud about it without any real evidence. I know because I actually tried to search for it. They are based in Canada and as such part of the Nine Eyes group, but they have a heavy no-logs focus towards privacy. What was seized was one of their Dutch proxies running on ram drives. They could put all the effort they want into preserving power, it doesn't mean much if all they don't have any logs except the vaguest of statistics. It doesn't matter how mature they are if the privacy practices are there.

Police have UPS-like devices which splice into existing mains cables to keep machines alive on the way into the forensics lab. Presumably it’s standard practice to use those.

Of course, the server could be configured to wipe itself if it loses connectivity for more than a few seconds, or its routing changes. The police would need devices that route Ethernet traffic over 5G, though those would presumably be detectable as bandwidth goes down and latency goes up.

Oh no, without a warrant. How could they. How impolite. No, our security is only intended for jurisdictions with law-abiding police.