[–] 1 point 4 months ago*

I already explained to you what I meant. If it is not getting through, it is not getting through.

Isn’t the stereotypical .ml user a pro-Russian tankie?

It's the why.

A couple of Marxist-Leninist hardliners walk into a bar and kick out everyone else.

The bartender asks, «Какие темы должно продвигать это „Агентство интернет-исследований“»?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (2 children)

    No, I'm telling you what I'm literally telling you. If you think Palantir is not going to have their data, I have a bridge to sell you.

    Shell companies are what used for tax avoidance, the tactic is the same: work influence through separate companies also controlled by you. I am not surprised someone from the .ml is defending the worst aspects of capitalism by nitpicking criticism against them, take that as you will.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (4 children)

    They are different companies in the same way Cambridge Analytica and Emerdata are different companies. Who's one of Persona's biggest invester through Founders Fund is Peter Thiel.

    This is such a basic tactic that it literally is used for tax avoidance: shell companies. If you think Palantir is not going to have their data, I have a bridge to sell you.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (11 children)

    From what I’ve seen, though, they don’t “have your data” as that’s not their thing.

    That's what they claim, and yet people were able to hack their Discord age verification tech and discover otherwise. Where have you even heard this, because I hope it's not from their CEO anyone on their board, He Peter Thiel often goes on religiously fueled technofeudalist rants about the antichrist, the end of the world, and the justification for unified warrant-less mass surveillance of it all.

    Oh, and: https://lemmy.world/post/44485368

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    That's a good point, but this technique isn't suddenly going to be replacing people's works, jobs, or IP.

    I've criticized NVIDIA for being the abusive monopoly that it is in nearly every other comment, but what you are describing isn't even limited to just NVIDIA, and frankly, I'm not going to be really defending major IP holders, just the small creators. There's a lot of generative AI that's endangering small creators, but in my opinion this is not endangering it.

    My biggest problem with AI training ignoring intellectual property is their hypocrisy to rush technology that is being used to try to replace a lot of real world jobs blindly, not to protect excessively long IP laws and IP copyright trolls and hoarders. People should download their free cars if they can.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    It's worse, I made plenty of criticism to go along with those comments. They are downvoting not only anything that breaks the circlejerk. They've been given free reign to be as toxic as possible, to the point of just being able to get away with spamming multiple communities with claims I'm a bot - and I can't even have my usual fun trolling back in the sea of downvotes because I wrongly dismissed that this was generative AI, something Jensen himself had referred to as 😭

    It would be funny if my account is lost for an issue so temporary. I've already begun to see the circlejerk try to get over what this actually is by switching over from claiming it is AI slop to saying it just makes it look like it and criticism that's actually more valid. Still, it's led to the pretty funny circumstances of people implying I'm an NVIDIA shill, because that also implies that NVIDIA shills have to now get around by telling people they should not support them and their abusive monopoly feeding the AI bubble through global cartels.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    It certainly is using generative AI methods given Jensen is calling it that. People have their own issues with things, but IP theft is the biggest for me given it shows the disturbing amount of leeway people developing have been given to break the law.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-dlss-5-delivers-ai-powered-breakthrough-in-visual-fidelity-for-games

    DLSS 5 introduces a real-time neural rendering model that infuses pixels with photoreal lighting and materials. Bridging the divide between rendering and reality, DLSS 5 empowers game developers to deliver a new level of photoreal computer graphics previously only achieved in Hollywood visual effects.

    DLSS 5 takes a game’s color and motion vectors for each frame as input, and uses an AI model to infuse the scene with photoreal lighting and materials that are anchored to source 3D content and consistent from frame to frame. DLSS 5 runs in real time at up to 4K resolution for smooth, interactive gameplay.

    At most it's texture generation, but if Jensen already identified it as generative AI, I'm not sure why they would then go and lie about it only affecting lighting and material at the pixel level.

    It’s image generation just like the prototypes that converted your drawings into “realistic” image are.

    This it is not, and if Jensen hadn't referred to as generative AI, I would still think it's just an evolution of what DLSS had been doing, except expanded to lighting and materials. Jensen obviously has no problem referring to this as generative AI, so I'm not sure why he would hide and lie about doing what you claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Amazon plans to use automation to replace more than 600,000 workers who would otherwise be hired in the United States by 2033, according to internal documents obtained by The New York Times. By that time, the company is expected to sell about twice as many goods as it does today.

    Amazon’s robotics team is reportedly working toward the goal of automating 75% of its entire business. By 2027, it is expected to eliminate around 160,000 jobs in the US, saving the company an estimated $12.6 billion — equivalent to around 30 cents per item delivered.

    view more: next ›