all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 52 points 6 months ago (1 child)

Shit made by rapists doesn't respect consent. Color me surprised.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    In the majority of cases, Grok returned sexualized images, even when told the subjects did not consent

    So all the countries are right that block this sh*t spitting machine.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    It’s a machine. It doesn’t understand the concept of consent or anything else for that matter.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    It must observe even these rules that it doesn't understand. Like everybody.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It can’t, it’s software that needs a governing body to dictate the rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    The rules are in its code. It was not designed with ethics in mind, it was designed to steal IP, fool people into thinking it's AI, and be profitable for its creators. They wrote the rules, and they do not care about right or wrong unless it impacts their bottom line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    The issue is more that there aren't rules. Given there are billions of parameters that define how these models work, there isn't really a way to ensure that it cant produce unwanted content.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago*

    Then they should be banned and made illegal. If one wants to run a LLM locally on their consumer machine then fine, they're paying the electric bill.

    But these things should not be running remotely on the internet were it's doing nothing but destroying our planet and collective sanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    That’s the point, there has to be a human in the loop that sets explicit guard rails

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    It can’t

    ...and that is an excuse since when?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Some news sources continue to claim Elon has disabled the generation of CSAM on his social site. But as long as the "guardrails" used by AI companies are as vague as AI instructions themselves, they can't be trusted in the best of times, let alone on Elon Musk's Twitter.

  • source