all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 115 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Good on them. Snap is a plague.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Why are they even still pushing that nonsense when flatpak at least somewhat gets closer to getting bwrap implemented right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    To be fair: snaps can work for all kinds of things all over the stack from the kernel to individual applications, while flatpak just does applications. Canonical is building a lot around those abilities to handle lower level things, so I guess it makes sense for them.

    IMHO flatpak does the applications better and more reliably and those are what I personally care for, so I personally stay away from snaps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    What is AFTL? Probably not "Anterior talofibular ligament" as the internet told me

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago

    Canonical could have done a lot better with the explanation message here. The idea is to push apps towards XDG compliance and the use of things like Portals.

    That said, unlike Wayland, portals really aren't there yet from a UX perspective, especially for an app that is heavy on file transfers.I prefer what Flathub does where it puts a nice green checker beside your app for XDG compliance - it's an encouragement, but not an enforcement.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This post title is misleading. The developer was working with Snap until Canonical didn't allowed it anymore. He's pissed with the policy enforcement which is strictly speaking commercial and as bad as Apple's afaik...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sorry, could you clarify what you mean? I don't see the difference. Isn't the author complaining about Canonical for the policy enforcement?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Canonical has been taking bad decisions for quite some time now, and this developer was trying to reach Ubuntu users even while probably knowing these. Which makes sense, of course. The point being that this dev's disappointment seems quite specific in these notes (against Snap), and imho he might work again towards shipping their app through Snap if he was allowed to. My comment compares Canonical to Apple, to give some context of where Canonical is at so many other idiosyncrasies (for example, I also heard other bad stuff about their H.R., in particular a way too lengthy hiring process.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Having worked with Unix and Linux for 29 years, some of it deep in os security, I strongly believe

    • canonical is good at hiding the fact they're evil as hell
    • snap is a bag o shite

    Cheers to this guy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago
    [+] -43 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Linux: easier to use than Windows🤣

    And commiting definitely isn't one of the biggest pains in the ass you could wish on yourself.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Windows doesn't even have a software repo.

    As a worst-case scenario, AFTL could just make you download it from the website and it would be exactly as bad as Windows UX.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -27 points 2 years ago (3 children)