you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why are they even still pushing that nonsense when flatpak at least somewhat gets closer to getting bwrap implemented right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    To be fair: snaps can work for all kinds of things all over the stack from the kernel to individual applications, while flatpak just does applications. Canonical is building a lot around those abilities to handle lower level things, so I guess it makes sense for them.

    IMHO flatpak does the applications better and more reliably and those are what I personally care for, so I personally stay away from snaps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments