Emails don't need to work like text messages. Why are reactions even a thing for them?
post
Outlook's own reaction handling is terrible. It adds the reaction icon to the email, but it doesn't mark it as unread or bring it to the top. The next day, I get an email with all the reactions for the day.
"Available for a meeting at 9 tomorrow?" 👍
Then the daily digest shows up at 9 and the meeting was never scheduled.
I’m confused as to why it wasn’t scheduled? Were you the one who was scheduling it, or were you reaction-replying to an invite, anticipating that the reaction emoji would accept the invitation and put the meeting on your calendar?
They sent a mail to check someone's availability and didnt send the invite because they got no response.
My work uses outlook and I still get a whole fuckin email saying "Dipshit has reacted 👍" and it's extremely irritating. I'll need to remember to turn off reactions on Monday.
I have a coworker that responds to everything with emojis. Teams messages. Emails. Everything. Even if it’s not relevant to him or directed at him. He always does it. I want to hit him with a chair.
I will say, it's practical for everyone using the same system. Sometimes it's nice to acknowledge an email without having to respond to it
And when I had my school account, they'd send out phishing alerts of what to look out for. Those emails would be spammed with crying laughing emojis
I disabled it as soon as they were launched. I also disabled the quick reply, reactions, and to text messages etc.
Hey let’s all change what we do and how we do it to accommodate the monopoly Microsoft. Again.
This how I learn that reactions to e-mail are a thing now? I'm not sure what to even think.
good thing i dont talk to anyone and i only get emails from companies, spam, and appointments. this would annoy the fuck outta me.
I got a thumbs-up reply to an email once and immediately looked up how to block it.
Seamonkey does this by default, took me ages to work out what the fuck this "J" people kept leaving on emails was
The real stupid thing here is that a header has to be added to disable reactions. Why didn't Microsoft just use a header to enable them? I mean make it opt in instead of opt out. Then they can use that header in all their Outlook shit and everyone else can go on with their day not worrying about it. So stupid, but not sure what I expected from Microsoft.
If you make a 'feature' opt-in, 3 people will use it, so the person who added it would have to work much harder to justify their paycheck. If you make everyone use your 'feature' by default, you can say 'look how many people use the feature I added,' while actually pointing at the number of people who didn't turn off the feature according to the spyware metrics.
I fucking guarantee you that Microsofts reasoning for this feature is to again force people to use their shit software.
Oh, don't want those spam mails? Yeaaaahhh, you need to switch to outlook for that.
Or, you know, just block domains that use Microsoft email
Or, you know, just block domains that use Microsoft email
I'm guessing you probably don't realize how many organizations host their email with Microsoft.
Reactions are great. They allow for feedback without adding to the pile of email everyone already gets.
i agree reactions can be useful, but adding them to email the way Microsoft has is obnoxious for recipients using any client other than theirs. and, i think this is probably their intention: receiving an email reaction in a client that doesn't render it as a reaction feels wrong and MS probably hopes this will encourage some people to switch to using Outlook.
the right way to add reactions to email would be to make it opt-in (and also not a vendor-specific header but instead something which aims to become a standard): clients should only allow reactions to messages which contain a header signaling that the sender supports receiving them.
but email is used specifically for receipts, otherwise messaging would be used
I realize that this is up to the user and that choice is great, so the issue comes down to implementation. and as a user... I find out far after the fact that somebody reacted to my email because outlook doesn't show me those notifications in a timely manner, nor am I going to look for them because I consider that a chat feature and Microsoft already sends me enough notification spam
Better to read and don't reply, or send a message and expect it was received IMO
If it's worth replying, write a reply. I do not need a notification from anyone of a round asshole flashing different colors and gyrating because you casually agree in a congratulatory fashion.
Coming from a neurodivergent: fuck Microsoft for doing this. It does not go along well with how email should work, makes it confusing for several reasons and shits over a lot of expectations.
Thankfully we’ve not yet upgraded from Outlook 2016… saving this for if we ever do.
Thankfully I haven't seen this, but if I did, the feature I'd be inclined to use is called "block sender".

top 50 comments