top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 244 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I don't know about y'all, but I know for sure who shot Kirk. It was the old man that lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C.. He is constantly using violent rhetoric and threatening anyone not white. He's scaring the neighbors. That's the guy that did it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 11 months ago (12 children)

    You know, I was actually like “Kirk who?” for a second.

    May we all move on to “Kirk who?” that quickly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 215 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    I 100% assume that the McDonald's employee who called on him is fake in some way, and they tracked him down through some kind of spy apparatus shit and just don't want to give away their methods.

    I have no evidence and I don't really know how these things work, it just seems way way more plausible to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Ok, I'll accept this conspiracy theory and add to it:

    It was actually the surveillance software in the AI drive through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Welcome to McDonalds
    Would you like to report any serious crimes today?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    Even if the tip was useful they can just claim to wasn't and just not pay it out. Not like there's an oversize process for it. Once they have the guy they can find the trail with whatever data they have and say they did it without the tip.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 162 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 95 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    or $1 per $500, or $2 per $1000. sorry, it was asking for fraction simplification

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 54 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Snitches can’t afford stitches due to duplicitous economic machinations.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 11 months ago

    Of course not. We know how it is living in the trump times.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 11 months ago

    he lost his job too lol bootlicker

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I KNOW WHO DID IT

    points to white house

    😏

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 44 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    No one will get paid any reward. Some corrupt official is going to pocket that money.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 42 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I swear if this guy is called Mario I'm going to lose my shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 11 months ago

    Like anyone can claim a reward for a false flag murder anyway.

  • source
  • [+] 34 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 31 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    They used to say the rewards was for information leading to the conviction. If they don’t get a conviction, the reward is forfeit by default.

    People are still gonna try though. They just have no legal recourse if the reward is not paid.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    They just have no legal recourse if the reward is not paid.

    To be clear, it's because while promissory estoppel and unilateral contracts are a very real thing you can sue over, sovereign immunity keeps that from being an option, particularly federally. If some private organization offered the reward you'd be fine, but when it is a sovereign immune government that hasn't waved it's immunity you're fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 11 months ago

    Roma traditoribus non praemiat

    Rome doesn't pay traitors

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    A lot of these rewards have small print that says that reward is for substantial information that leads to the arrest and CONVICTION of a suspect. The suspect has been arrested, but not yet convicted. Maybe they'll get their money at the end, if Luigi gets convicted, which I highly doubt.

    Otherwise, people would just be turning in randos for the rewards. They have to be credible enough suspects that they can be convicted.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Jokes on us. The taste of boot is all the reward they need.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 11 months ago* (3 children)

    I think it was Herschel, the Cracker Barrel Cracker that got canceled and reborn in a matter of days. He shot Charlie Kirk b/c he got canceled. Btw, that crowd in Utah was so white that mayonnaise was labeled spicy at the food court on campus. Also this, if the mf’er didn’t want to get shot, why in thee hell did he go to a school that coincidentally rolled back their policies regarding weapons/firearms on campus? There is that.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 15 points 11 months ago

    No one ever gets those rewards, or if they do, it's a couple hundred dollars for all your time they wasted.

    Doesn't help to snitch to the government.

  • source
  • [+] 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    They're not looking for the culprit. They're looking for $100k.

    Gonna be a lot of false arrests and fingerpointing.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›