Most people aren’t going to voluntarily do anything that drastically changes their life. Big fuckin surprise.
post
This is such a bullshit response. There are plenty of vegetarian options when eating out in Australia. And the more vegetarians there are, the more options restaurants will offer.
City? Yeah, if you pay a fair whack or live near one of the buddhist or hindu country diaspora hubs. Out bush? Yeah, nah. There will be one menu item, maybe two if you include the garden salad as being a meal.
One of the few vegetarian meals I've been able to have back home is "& chips"
Sometimes we make it fancy and have potato cakes too, but there are only so many ways you can deep fry a potato before throwing up
Yeah that's true. I'm a city dweller and spoilt for choice. But I reckon if more people were asking for it out bush, the restaurants would update their menus.
Also depends on the city I imagine. I now describe myself as an "omnivore who prefers to not eat the animals" due to desperate times when going out...
Depends what you even call "city" really. Even in the most populated capital, things can get really dire in the outer suburban sprawl. Especially if they're mostly Anglo-european suburbs. Your choices start to be mostly "vegetarian burger using frozen gross patties" at the local bowling club or "pre-frozen falafel kebab". And the "don't add meat" option at the ubiquitous Chinese and Thai joints.
I guess it varies. There are vegetarian options at a lot of places, but I often find it's only one or two options.
It really depends on the venue of course. Some of my favourite places have tons of options, but most of my friends aren't interested in those. It also gets even harder when the few vegetarian options are often ruled out for you due to other dietary restrictions...
A study shows Australians would rather take other actions to help the environment than give up meat.
So exactly the same as polling on alternatives to the Voice. Australians want vague solutions to problems they pretend to care about, but when you propose actual solutions: crickets.
The list of options participants were given:
- Eat less meat (50% reduction)
- Stop eating meat
- Avoid food products imported by plane
- Use public transport
- Recycle things more
- Buy fewer new things
- More energy from renewable sources
Some of it is a bit less actionable then "eat less meat", but they're still pretty concrete.
The willingness seems pretty low on everything but "renewable sources" and recycling which requires the least effort from people.
There being some willingness to reduce meat is nice, but I've heard that line before (people rarely follow through in practice).
I have already done all these except #2. And yes - I mean that. I have changed my lifestyle over the past 10-15 years doing these things consciously.
Stop having children if you're that worried about it.
Yes, let's not make life sustainable for future generations, let's... not have future generations at all?? What kind of logic is that
Haha. That wasn't one of the options they gave. Nor was "Don't have a dog or cat"
Lol lmao. Everyone who is like "I'd give up meat if only there were more options at restaurants" should immediately give it up except at restaurants where there are no meatless options in order to fulfill their own stated values.
Of course, my bet is it's just a rationalisation. Our culture sucks and people are always looking for some reason why doing the bare minimum is unreasonable.
Participants cite a lack of vegetarian options when dining out
Well it's not a religion. Eat meat if you don't find anything else on the menu. Avoid it when cooking yourself. But it's not about that, people are addicted to meat and don't want to reduce their consumption.
We’re not “addicted to eating meat”, we just enjoy eating meat. It’s good for us and it tastes good and it’s easy to get.
Wait. You think Australians will take action. Hahahahaha
If you believe the study enough to mock the outcome, then yes, apparently they'll take other actions:
"They are very happy to get more energy from renewable resources, to recycle things more, to buy fewer new things — which all do have an impact."
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Australians love eating meat and say limited vegetarian options when dining out is a key barrier to changing their diet, despite more meat-free choices than ever, new research has found.
The report found respondents, who were aged between 18 and 84, believed reducing and eliminating meat intake were ineffective ways to address climate change.
"Although past research has shown that animal agriculture contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, our participants believed reducing and eliminating meat intake to be some of the least effective actions against climate change," co-author and provisional psychologist from La Trobe University Ashley Rattenbury said.
Two thirds of the La Trobe University study participants said having limited options when eating out was a barrier to adopting a vegetarian diet.
The La Trobe research was compared to a similar study conducted in 2003 by Emma Lea and Anthony Worsley, from Deakin University, which asked hundreds of Australians for their beliefs about barriers and benefits to vegetarianism.
The La Trobe University study also asked participants about their perceptions of the effectiveness of stopping or reducing meat consumption, compared to how willing they would be to engage in other actions that benefited the environment.
The original article contains 429 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
all 50 comments