submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk
 

They also announced that their servers are moving outside out of Switzerland due to concerns with the new surveillance proposals.

all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Kind of light on details. "Lumo is based upon open-source language models". Okay. Which ones? [Edit: they offer more details at https://proton.me/support/lumo-privacy : "The models weโ€™re using currently are Nemo, OpenHands 32B, OLMO 2 32B, and Mistral Small 3"]

Not sure how I feel about this. I figured Proton would find some clever way to run models on encrypted data, or at least do something akin to Apple's "private cloud compute" but...nope, just another cloud platform like any other. Zero-logging is all fine and good, but don't pretend like you can't access my chats when the only thing stopping you is your logging policy.

Web search โ€” If you ask it to, Lumo can search the web for new or recent information to complement its existing knowledge.

Again, no details. So you're not sharing my data, but you are potentially leaking it to unnamed search engines? Cool, cool.

Oh, and it has built in Proton Docs integration, in case you wanted to accidentally send your documents, unencrypted, through Proton's servers. And also maybe leak their contents to a third-party search engine, who knows?

Please, Proton. E2EE or GTFO. The world doesn't need another chatbot. If you can't do it right, just don't do it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • Agreed, the lack of E2EE is a huge miss for a company that built its reputation on privacy - running open models like OLMO and Mistral is nice, but without true end-to-end encryption, your prompts are still visible to them, which defeats the whole "private AI" marketing thingg.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    privacy first

    model is not open source

    trust me bro we don't share your data

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    And to where exactly are the servers moving? And why do they still have a Twitter link?

    Transparency is key!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    god andy yen is just the worst; he continues to ruin proton any way he can.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    What is wrong with adding an llm? That is not even integrates in other proton products?

    EU needs in-house LLMs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    llms are rubbish and shouldn't exist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They said it integrates with Proton Drive. Optional, but still. That is data that is otherwise strictly end-to-end encrypted, and now they're adding a "convenient" method to send it through their AI unencrypted, and they are not upfront about that.

    Proton has a problem with focus. They keep adding new things of limited value, presumably in a quest for growth. That usually doesn't end well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Proton is based in Switzerland. Not EU.

    Edit: Apparently that's changing.

    Because of legal uncertainty around Swiss government proposals to introduce mass surveillance โ€” proposals that have been outlawed in the EU โ€” Proton is moving most of its physical infrastructure out of Switzerland. Lumo will be the first product to move.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I understand your point of view, but I think that in todayโ€™s society, a company canโ€™t afford to fall too far behind when it comes to current uses. Iโ€™m perfectly aware of the risks that AI brings, but if it can enable some people to find a -private- way out of American AI, I think itโ€™s a good thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 9 points 1 year ago

    Another company I won't touch again then

  • source
  • [โ€“] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Did Proton train their own LLM or is it a Mistral model?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • Ever since Proton went MAGA their presence has just gotten weirder. This is another giant step in a direction nobody wanted.

    Glad I dropped them.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [โ€“] 6 points 1 year ago
    [โ€“] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I donโ€™t get it? This is more about a chatbot service than about LMM, right? It doesnโ€™t sound like they release the model, which would mean itโ€™s less privacy-friendly than running R1, Qwen3, Llama, Mistral or Gemma3 on your own machines. Google and Meta honestly offer better privacy with Gemma and Llama.

    Edit: Okay, "Private LLM Called Lumo" is what the title of this post says, that has nothing to do with what Proton wrote. Proton only wrote that it wonโ€™t be used to train LLM.

    Iโ€™ll still stick to Ollama + https://github.com/n4ze3m/page-assist

  • source
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Proton is dead, who cares.

  • source