Hard synths vs soft synths. Hard synth purists scoff at soft synths because they are not "authentic" and merely simulations. Soft synth snobs scoff at hard synth users because they are old timers who can't move on to the future. Both are fine, do what you want. At the end of the day, what matters is if the music you produce is actually good.
post
Vi vs Emacs
replies:
GIF v. Jif
replies:
systemd but now that the "debate" is effectively iver it seems like Wayland will be the next big one.
replies:
Gnome vs KDE, just use whichever one suits your flow. Or not, grab Cinnamon or Hyprland if that floats your boat. Options are good!
replies:
Tabs vs. spaces
replies:
Arch vs Nix.
messenger services
No way to communicate between them.
Operating Systems.
But that is an easy jab
Mobile phones
The "generative" AI debate.
Most of the criticisms are misleading and hyperbolic (if not straight up counter-productive), and it has zero real use cases other than making the internet useless by filling it with thousands of scam websites. I guess it could also be used to give you a TLDR of things. Either way though nothing we do or say is going to change things since the technology is already out there.
all 27 comments