all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)
  • [+] [S] -30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Interesting myopic & binary definitions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Lol.

    Shows how little you know.

    In the military, shit isn't up for debate. You do as you're told. It is very much black and white.

    (Well, from some exceptions we don't need to get to because you'd never reach the level where one has to utilise their own brain.)

    edit this excludes warcrimes obviously. ALL soldiers EVERYWHERE are mandated to refuse orders that would lead to warcrimes. (how they're taught what are warcrimes is a different matter entirely)

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
  • [+] [S] -36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    On a scale of how Ignorant are you....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    There has never been a time where soldiers were fighting for freedom. They fight for their master.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's a very cynical view. Their country is their master, if they got invaded, like Ukraine do, then them fighting for their master(or country, if you will) is fighting for freedom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Fighting foreign enemies at home doesn't automatically make it a "fight for freedom". Case in point: Taliban vs USA

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe not in our lifetime, but you're really going to say ww2 wasn't to stop evil? What about the civil war?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    This post screams of insecurity and sadness on the part of OP.

    I think OP romanticizes the idea of being a soldier like a Hollywood actor.

    OP has never served.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    That not how any of that works.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    +1 actually a shower thought

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    When you're a soldier you don't really have agency over the morality of what you do, aside from being technically allowed to protest against committing war crimes.

    So no.

    You just generally hope the government of the military you're serving is makes the moral call.

    What you're thinking of is a violent psychotic vigilante.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Naw man as a soldier you will be told to do your tiny part of a tiny task. No kidding that part may just be, take that water tank over there and wait until told what to do.

  • source
  • If you're one of those brave dudes trying to hit aircraft with old rocket launchers while sprinting in your flipflops, you're almost certainly putting down evil, sure.

  • source