top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 196 points 1 year ago (6 children)

They really figured out the infinite money glitch.

They've been nothing but fair to me as a customer but the cynic in me thinks they've got an excessive amount of good will to squander since they dominate the PC gaming scene.

Please don't become shitty. And please release new non competitive games.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 132 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Gaben said it best when he said "piracy is a service issue, not a price issue." There is no other company that even comes close to matching Steam's services, both to consumers and developers. The industry could become a different place when he dies. I don't see any other CEO continuing to spend money to innovate and expand services rather than offer less and charge more to extract record profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I feel the same, I know that things will likely go downhill if he goes. That's why I also buy GoG games, I want to be able to download them if things go sour with Steam.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You can downlowad some of the steam games. DRM is possible, but not mandatory

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I mean this is obvious af

    When Netflix had 90% of the shows that you wanted to watch and they weren’t annoying little fucks with account sharing and geo location, everyone was happy to support them

    But once paying users feel like they are being taken advantage of, instead of catered to, they leave.

    There’s so many cases where pirating is not only cheaper (duh) it’s actually a better product/experience. And when you charge to provide a worse product/experience than what people can get for free, then you can’t be surprised at the outcome

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's what you can do if you're not publicly traded. The supposedly "wise" market whenever anything goes wrong always seems to insist on burning down decades of good-will to extract a few bucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 93 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 74 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And it was a shitload of work that took a decade plus, even being built on top of pieces that were even older, with absolutely zero guarantee of any kind of a payout.

    Very few companies make these kinds of risks anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    It's not only goodwill, it's a survival tactic for valve. The worst case scenario for them, is see microsoft expand their monopoly to have all apps and software available only through their Microsoft app store, competing directly with valve, with the unfair advantage of microsoft controlling both windows and the app store. They could (and probably have) tried to get to where apple is with its app store on macos/ios. Though of course this would be an anticompetitive move, but the intentions could still exist making valves life difficult.

    The moment they can untie gaming from windows, they have a path forward to keeping themselves not only alive but relevant and probably safe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They could (and probably have) tried to get to where apple is with its app store on macos/ios.

    They did.

    The Windows 10/11 "S Mode" only allows installing software through the Windows store. It was mostly relegated to OEM installs for cheap x86 and ARM laptops, thankfully.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    I've been on Steam since 2005, and the only thing that sucks about Valve is that their steam sales are shit now. Other than that I've had no issues with them. They seem like a decent company.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 39 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Valve is the living proof that you can have great service and still be profitable. Will capitalists learn? No

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why have great service and be profitable when you can have terrible service and be 1.6% more profitable?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Wonder how much of this comes from the gambling business. They don’t own the secondary market where you can sell skins, but they are the gateway into that world.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    I suspect a fair chunk. Steam for gamers and devs is great and all but its underbelly of opening up the world of gambling to kids is real gross. Its insane how valve has been getting away with it for so long.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I really hope that the workers are well compensated.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Weird how if you pay the people activly invested in a product things work rather than having to awnser to why line no go up

  • source
  • [+] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [+] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›