Yes

9 is obviously higher on the list, it's a higher number!

The hats were made famous by a legendary Fr*nch regiment. When that regiment was given a damn good spanking, the British captured the hats, and started wearing them to taunt the Fr*nch.

Yeah but these are often accompanied by us flying all of our military aircraft over London. I think the analogy holds, even if ours is a bit eccentric.

You underestimate how old of a bag she was and how large the British empire was before it fell. Plus, if the Kim fam is on the list, then she sure as hell belongs there too, as well as mr inbred sausage fingers.

Yeah, an important distinction is that the king/queen didn't decide to do this, it's a tradition going way back.

The Norks Kims are world leaders and KC3 isn't? Did I accidentally stumble into a .ml echo chamber?

On looking at the OP's list I was also wondering why Trooping the Colour wasn't on it, as it is a military parade for the (official) birthday of one of the leaders in the G7.

King Charles III is not symbolic; he is the ruler of the UK and the Commonwealth. He refers to Parliament as "my government" in his speeches and no new laws can be passed without his approval (Royal assent). He is the head of the military and the Church. So referring to Charles as a symbolic figurehead is factually inaccurate. Deferring power to Parliament doesn't change that. Taking it up again may cause a constitutional crisis, but I believe it is an option.

This seems like a fairly reliable source, on the grounds that although it's "only" a blog, solicitors aren't known for posting misinformation. https://www.milnerslaw.co.uk/could-king-charles-iii-dissolve-parliament/

“We’re going to have to try and top it”

Narrator: "He didn't."