top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 163 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Google is not a search engine. It's an advertising service. Their whole business model revolves around a critical mass of eyeballs, which flock to free services. This will never happen for the average user.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 104 points 2 years ago
    [–] 88 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    If you say you'd pay for a search engine. Oof. Guys we used to just link useful things at the end of our blog posts and on our myspace pages. Then search engines came in and we didn't have to. Then they killed the SEO placement of blogs. Now you can't find anything useful unless you try their AI. The whole business model is convincing us we need them while they make the internet less efficient to scroll through.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    ... do you think MySpace came before search engines?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Replace Myspace with Geocities and it's broadly correct of my experience in 90s internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 73 points 2 years ago

    Actual Internet funeral

  • source
  • [–] 71 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 54 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Image Transcription:

    A white page with black text. On the top left is the Google logo. Underneath is text reading:

    "UH OH!

    "You've used all 75 of your daily free searches!. You're currently using Google Lite for infinite searches, please consider subscribing to Google Premium."

    On the right side is a digital drawing of a bulldog standing like a human with its right forepaw on its hip and its left forepaw holding a pair of binoculars to its eyes. Underneath the dog is text reading:

    "Get one month of Google Premium for $14.99 AUD!"

    [I am a human, if I’ve made a mistake please let me know. Please consider providing alt-text for ease of use. Thank you. 💜 We have a community! If you wish for us to transcribe something, want to help improve ease of use here on Lemmy, or just want to hang out with us, join us at !lemmy_scribes@lemmy.world!]

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 53 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I'd pay for google if they didn't steal my data.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 53 points 2 years ago* (34 children)

    I might be the odd person out here, but if Google offered a premium sub service that did 0 data collection and I never got served a thing by ad sense, I'd pay for it.

    My thought is that with data collection and advertising you become the product that is being sold. I'd rather buy a product than be a product.

    EDIT: Not just search, but a sub for all Google products I use.

  • source
  • hideshow 40 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Knowing Google, they'd charge you and still track you. Also, if YouTube Red is any indication, they'd probably charge closer to $150. You can get a search engine that doesn't track you or have ads called Kagi, for $10 per month.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Oh, they’d be happy to offer you that for $4.99/mo. Then, after a year or so, they’d inject some preferred provider search results, and bump the ad-free tier to $9.99 mo. The $4.99 tier would be unlimited search, but with ads. Want to block bullshitty SEO sites? Extra $2.99.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (28 replies)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm not sure you you understand how Google makes money...which would tell you why this would never happen.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I thought I understood how Twitter made money

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is literally how their search API works. Except the limit is more like 25 queries a day and the price would be closer to $40/mo for average user's usage.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (29 children)
  • load more comments (28 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    They're already working on this shit. I can't get them to stop spamming me that my storage is almost full. I'm like, hmm, 80% full after using it for fifteen years, that means by math I've got at least three more years of storage left. Oh wait, if I take my videos down to local storage it goes up to six or seven years left.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Fucking do it, I dare you.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I've recently started paying for unlimited searches over on Kagi, and I'm very happy with the results so far. I'd gladly pay if it meant less search cruft and higher result quality, but sadly Google's just been going downhill for quite a while now.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Its a big black box with an unquantifiable improvement in quality, and I have no particular inclination to sign of for yet another subscription service. Particularly when I already watch my existing services creep up in price year after year.

    That's before I even get into shit like standard utilities. My electricity bill last month was $500, almost entirely based on the Texas AC bill. Bro, who has another $10/mo to spend on Newoogle when I'm maxed out just keeping the lights on?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›