▲ 1217 ▼ UH OH! (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by fucker@lemmy.world to c/internetfuneral@lemmy.world 171 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Wisely@lemm.ee 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I understand why you would pay and can respect it. But access to an organized and searchable internet is something closer to a right than a privilege, in my mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Wisely@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world -43 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] george@lemmy.org.il 26 points 2 years ago (3 children) Care to explain? Or you're only capable of talking shit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] devopspalmer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) It sounds like what the picture is making fun of, already materialized in this kagi search engine. Paying for a search just is a about face from what the Internet was designed to be. You could argue everything is this way, but I'd then argue consumers are bigger pushovers now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 years ago (3 children) Everyone pays for search. You do it through attention/data traded to advertisers or currency. If Kagi is functionally better than Google and respects my privacy, I would not mind paying for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) No, actually. SearX/SearXNG is a free and open source, highly customizable, and self-hostable meta search engine. SearX instances act as a middle man, they query other search engines for you, stripping all their spyware ad crap and never having your connection touch their servers. Of course you have to trust the SearX instance host with your query information, but again if you are that paranoid just self host. I personally also trust some foss loving sysadmin that host social services for free out of alturism, who also accepts hosting donations, with my info over Google/Alphabet any day. Heres a list of all public searx instances, I personally prefer to use paulgo.io All SearX instances are configured different to index different engines. If one doesn't seem to give good results try a few others. Did I mention it has bangs like duckduckgo? If you really need google like for maps and buisness info just use !!g in the query search.marginalia.nu is a completely novel search engine written and hosted by one dude that aims to prioritize indexing lighter websites little to no javascript as these tend to be personal websites and homepages that have poor SEO and the big search engines won't index well. If you remember the internet of the early 2000s and want a nostalgia trip this ones for you Finally, YaCy is another completely novel search engine that uses p2p technology to power a big webcrawler which prioritizes indexes based off user queries and feedback. Everyone can download yacy and devote a bit of their computing power to help out a collective search engine. Companies can also download yacy and use it to index their private intranets. They have a public instance available through a web portal. Its not a great search engine for what most people want, which is quick and relevant information within the first few clicks. But it is an interesting use of technology and what a true honest-to-god community-operated search engine would look like untainted by SEO scores. I hope this has been informative to those who believe theres only a few options to pick from, I hate to be the 'bhut achthually' guy but know these options are so unknown to most people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem with all those search providers is: Someone still has to pay for infrastructure. You can either donate/pay for the service or accept ads and tracking. (I know that YaCy works a bit differently, but honestly even though I really like the idea of the system: This "novel" search engine is almost 20 years old now and never really worked very good.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Very true, there always being a cost somewhere is a general rule for all services in general. Its the reality of computer infrastructure that theres gotta be a computer/server somewhere eating bandwidth and energy, and someone with enough time + technical knowledge to maintain them. Those cost need to be offset either through donation or profit, or the service provider just has to eat the expenses and pay out of pocket. 'no cost actually' is in reference to the end users directly paying for something with direct money or collected private info sold to ad companies. In many public hosting instances for open source services most active users don't pay or donate at all and get to use the service without their info being sold. In these cases the expense is split between a few donations from better off charitable users and the rest is out of pocket from the sysadmin who most likely has a real job that pays well enough they can eat the hosting fees and not worry about it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You're welcome 😎 permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] SCB@lemmy.world -7 points 2 years ago Your purchase is monumentally stupid and he's laughing at that permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yet it would be interesting to hear, why this shocks you so much. :) Is it because you don't think search engines are a service worth paying for or because Google, Bing, DDG … are free? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FLX@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I'm not sure if this is really feasible (even though I'd be happy to see a working libre search engine). The problem I see is that a search engine is incredibly expensive to run, which makes it hard to maintain servers on a donation model. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I understand why you would pay and can respect it. But access to an organized and searchable internet is something closer to a right than a privilege, in my mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Wisely@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FLX@lemmy.world -43 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] george@lemmy.org.il 26 points 2 years ago (3 children) Care to explain? Or you're only capable of talking shit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] devopspalmer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) It sounds like what the picture is making fun of, already materialized in this kagi search engine. Paying for a search just is a about face from what the Internet was designed to be. You could argue everything is this way, but I'd then argue consumers are bigger pushovers now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 years ago (3 children) Everyone pays for search. You do it through attention/data traded to advertisers or currency. If Kagi is functionally better than Google and respects my privacy, I would not mind paying for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) No, actually. SearX/SearXNG is a free and open source, highly customizable, and self-hostable meta search engine. SearX instances act as a middle man, they query other search engines for you, stripping all their spyware ad crap and never having your connection touch their servers. Of course you have to trust the SearX instance host with your query information, but again if you are that paranoid just self host. I personally also trust some foss loving sysadmin that host social services for free out of alturism, who also accepts hosting donations, with my info over Google/Alphabet any day. Heres a list of all public searx instances, I personally prefer to use paulgo.io All SearX instances are configured different to index different engines. If one doesn't seem to give good results try a few others. Did I mention it has bangs like duckduckgo? If you really need google like for maps and buisness info just use !!g in the query search.marginalia.nu is a completely novel search engine written and hosted by one dude that aims to prioritize indexing lighter websites little to no javascript as these tend to be personal websites and homepages that have poor SEO and the big search engines won't index well. If you remember the internet of the early 2000s and want a nostalgia trip this ones for you Finally, YaCy is another completely novel search engine that uses p2p technology to power a big webcrawler which prioritizes indexes based off user queries and feedback. Everyone can download yacy and devote a bit of their computing power to help out a collective search engine. Companies can also download yacy and use it to index their private intranets. They have a public instance available through a web portal. Its not a great search engine for what most people want, which is quick and relevant information within the first few clicks. But it is an interesting use of technology and what a true honest-to-god community-operated search engine would look like untainted by SEO scores. I hope this has been informative to those who believe theres only a few options to pick from, I hate to be the 'bhut achthually' guy but know these options are so unknown to most people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem with all those search providers is: Someone still has to pay for infrastructure. You can either donate/pay for the service or accept ads and tracking. (I know that YaCy works a bit differently, but honestly even though I really like the idea of the system: This "novel" search engine is almost 20 years old now and never really worked very good.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Very true, there always being a cost somewhere is a general rule for all services in general. Its the reality of computer infrastructure that theres gotta be a computer/server somewhere eating bandwidth and energy, and someone with enough time + technical knowledge to maintain them. Those cost need to be offset either through donation or profit, or the service provider just has to eat the expenses and pay out of pocket. 'no cost actually' is in reference to the end users directly paying for something with direct money or collected private info sold to ad companies. In many public hosting instances for open source services most active users don't pay or donate at all and get to use the service without their info being sold. In these cases the expense is split between a few donations from better off charitable users and the rest is out of pocket from the sysadmin who most likely has a real job that pays well enough they can eat the hosting fees and not worry about it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You're welcome 😎 permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] SCB@lemmy.world -7 points 2 years ago Your purchase is monumentally stupid and he's laughing at that permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yet it would be interesting to hear, why this shocks you so much. :) Is it because you don't think search engines are a service worth paying for or because Google, Bing, DDG … are free? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FLX@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I'm not sure if this is really feasible (even though I'd be happy to see a working libre search engine). The problem I see is that a search engine is incredibly expensive to run, which makes it hard to maintain servers on a donation model. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] george@lemmy.org.il 26 points 2 years ago (3 children) Care to explain? Or you're only capable of talking shit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] devopspalmer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) It sounds like what the picture is making fun of, already materialized in this kagi search engine. Paying for a search just is a about face from what the Internet was designed to be. You could argue everything is this way, but I'd then argue consumers are bigger pushovers now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 years ago (3 children) Everyone pays for search. You do it through attention/data traded to advertisers or currency. If Kagi is functionally better than Google and respects my privacy, I would not mind paying for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) No, actually. SearX/SearXNG is a free and open source, highly customizable, and self-hostable meta search engine. SearX instances act as a middle man, they query other search engines for you, stripping all their spyware ad crap and never having your connection touch their servers. Of course you have to trust the SearX instance host with your query information, but again if you are that paranoid just self host. I personally also trust some foss loving sysadmin that host social services for free out of alturism, who also accepts hosting donations, with my info over Google/Alphabet any day. Heres a list of all public searx instances, I personally prefer to use paulgo.io All SearX instances are configured different to index different engines. If one doesn't seem to give good results try a few others. Did I mention it has bangs like duckduckgo? If you really need google like for maps and buisness info just use !!g in the query search.marginalia.nu is a completely novel search engine written and hosted by one dude that aims to prioritize indexing lighter websites little to no javascript as these tend to be personal websites and homepages that have poor SEO and the big search engines won't index well. If you remember the internet of the early 2000s and want a nostalgia trip this ones for you Finally, YaCy is another completely novel search engine that uses p2p technology to power a big webcrawler which prioritizes indexes based off user queries and feedback. Everyone can download yacy and devote a bit of their computing power to help out a collective search engine. Companies can also download yacy and use it to index their private intranets. They have a public instance available through a web portal. Its not a great search engine for what most people want, which is quick and relevant information within the first few clicks. But it is an interesting use of technology and what a true honest-to-god community-operated search engine would look like untainted by SEO scores. I hope this has been informative to those who believe theres only a few options to pick from, I hate to be the 'bhut achthually' guy but know these options are so unknown to most people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem with all those search providers is: Someone still has to pay for infrastructure. You can either donate/pay for the service or accept ads and tracking. (I know that YaCy works a bit differently, but honestly even though I really like the idea of the system: This "novel" search engine is almost 20 years old now and never really worked very good.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Very true, there always being a cost somewhere is a general rule for all services in general. Its the reality of computer infrastructure that theres gotta be a computer/server somewhere eating bandwidth and energy, and someone with enough time + technical knowledge to maintain them. Those cost need to be offset either through donation or profit, or the service provider just has to eat the expenses and pay out of pocket. 'no cost actually' is in reference to the end users directly paying for something with direct money or collected private info sold to ad companies. In many public hosting instances for open source services most active users don't pay or donate at all and get to use the service without their info being sold. In these cases the expense is split between a few donations from better off charitable users and the rest is out of pocket from the sysadmin who most likely has a real job that pays well enough they can eat the hosting fees and not worry about it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You're welcome 😎 permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] SCB@lemmy.world -7 points 2 years ago Your purchase is monumentally stupid and he's laughing at that permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yet it would be interesting to hear, why this shocks you so much. :) Is it because you don't think search engines are a service worth paying for or because Google, Bing, DDG … are free? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FLX@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I'm not sure if this is really feasible (even though I'd be happy to see a working libre search engine). The problem I see is that a search engine is incredibly expensive to run, which makes it hard to maintain servers on a donation model. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] devopspalmer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) It sounds like what the picture is making fun of, already materialized in this kagi search engine. Paying for a search just is a about face from what the Internet was designed to be. You could argue everything is this way, but I'd then argue consumers are bigger pushovers now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 years ago (3 children) Everyone pays for search. You do it through attention/data traded to advertisers or currency. If Kagi is functionally better than Google and respects my privacy, I would not mind paying for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) No, actually. SearX/SearXNG is a free and open source, highly customizable, and self-hostable meta search engine. SearX instances act as a middle man, they query other search engines for you, stripping all their spyware ad crap and never having your connection touch their servers. Of course you have to trust the SearX instance host with your query information, but again if you are that paranoid just self host. I personally also trust some foss loving sysadmin that host social services for free out of alturism, who also accepts hosting donations, with my info over Google/Alphabet any day. Heres a list of all public searx instances, I personally prefer to use paulgo.io All SearX instances are configured different to index different engines. If one doesn't seem to give good results try a few others. Did I mention it has bangs like duckduckgo? If you really need google like for maps and buisness info just use !!g in the query search.marginalia.nu is a completely novel search engine written and hosted by one dude that aims to prioritize indexing lighter websites little to no javascript as these tend to be personal websites and homepages that have poor SEO and the big search engines won't index well. If you remember the internet of the early 2000s and want a nostalgia trip this ones for you Finally, YaCy is another completely novel search engine that uses p2p technology to power a big webcrawler which prioritizes indexes based off user queries and feedback. Everyone can download yacy and devote a bit of their computing power to help out a collective search engine. Companies can also download yacy and use it to index their private intranets. They have a public instance available through a web portal. Its not a great search engine for what most people want, which is quick and relevant information within the first few clicks. But it is an interesting use of technology and what a true honest-to-god community-operated search engine would look like untainted by SEO scores. I hope this has been informative to those who believe theres only a few options to pick from, I hate to be the 'bhut achthually' guy but know these options are so unknown to most people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem with all those search providers is: Someone still has to pay for infrastructure. You can either donate/pay for the service or accept ads and tracking. (I know that YaCy works a bit differently, but honestly even though I really like the idea of the system: This "novel" search engine is almost 20 years old now and never really worked very good.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Very true, there always being a cost somewhere is a general rule for all services in general. Its the reality of computer infrastructure that theres gotta be a computer/server somewhere eating bandwidth and energy, and someone with enough time + technical knowledge to maintain them. Those cost need to be offset either through donation or profit, or the service provider just has to eat the expenses and pay out of pocket. 'no cost actually' is in reference to the end users directly paying for something with direct money or collected private info sold to ad companies. In many public hosting instances for open source services most active users don't pay or donate at all and get to use the service without their info being sold. In these cases the expense is split between a few donations from better off charitable users and the rest is out of pocket from the sysadmin who most likely has a real job that pays well enough they can eat the hosting fees and not worry about it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You're welcome 😎 permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 years ago (3 children) Everyone pays for search. You do it through attention/data traded to advertisers or currency. If Kagi is functionally better than Google and respects my privacy, I would not mind paying for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) No, actually. SearX/SearXNG is a free and open source, highly customizable, and self-hostable meta search engine. SearX instances act as a middle man, they query other search engines for you, stripping all their spyware ad crap and never having your connection touch their servers. Of course you have to trust the SearX instance host with your query information, but again if you are that paranoid just self host. I personally also trust some foss loving sysadmin that host social services for free out of alturism, who also accepts hosting donations, with my info over Google/Alphabet any day. Heres a list of all public searx instances, I personally prefer to use paulgo.io All SearX instances are configured different to index different engines. If one doesn't seem to give good results try a few others. Did I mention it has bangs like duckduckgo? If you really need google like for maps and buisness info just use !!g in the query search.marginalia.nu is a completely novel search engine written and hosted by one dude that aims to prioritize indexing lighter websites little to no javascript as these tend to be personal websites and homepages that have poor SEO and the big search engines won't index well. If you remember the internet of the early 2000s and want a nostalgia trip this ones for you Finally, YaCy is another completely novel search engine that uses p2p technology to power a big webcrawler which prioritizes indexes based off user queries and feedback. Everyone can download yacy and devote a bit of their computing power to help out a collective search engine. Companies can also download yacy and use it to index their private intranets. They have a public instance available through a web portal. Its not a great search engine for what most people want, which is quick and relevant information within the first few clicks. But it is an interesting use of technology and what a true honest-to-god community-operated search engine would look like untainted by SEO scores. I hope this has been informative to those who believe theres only a few options to pick from, I hate to be the 'bhut achthually' guy but know these options are so unknown to most people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem with all those search providers is: Someone still has to pay for infrastructure. You can either donate/pay for the service or accept ads and tracking. (I know that YaCy works a bit differently, but honestly even though I really like the idea of the system: This "novel" search engine is almost 20 years old now and never really worked very good.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Very true, there always being a cost somewhere is a general rule for all services in general. Its the reality of computer infrastructure that theres gotta be a computer/server somewhere eating bandwidth and energy, and someone with enough time + technical knowledge to maintain them. Those cost need to be offset either through donation or profit, or the service provider just has to eat the expenses and pay out of pocket. 'no cost actually' is in reference to the end users directly paying for something with direct money or collected private info sold to ad companies. In many public hosting instances for open source services most active users don't pay or donate at all and get to use the service without their info being sold. In these cases the expense is split between a few donations from better off charitable users and the rest is out of pocket from the sysadmin who most likely has a real job that pays well enough they can eat the hosting fees and not worry about it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You're welcome 😎 permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) No, actually. SearX/SearXNG is a free and open source, highly customizable, and self-hostable meta search engine. SearX instances act as a middle man, they query other search engines for you, stripping all their spyware ad crap and never having your connection touch their servers. Of course you have to trust the SearX instance host with your query information, but again if you are that paranoid just self host. I personally also trust some foss loving sysadmin that host social services for free out of alturism, who also accepts hosting donations, with my info over Google/Alphabet any day. Heres a list of all public searx instances, I personally prefer to use paulgo.io All SearX instances are configured different to index different engines. If one doesn't seem to give good results try a few others. Did I mention it has bangs like duckduckgo? If you really need google like for maps and buisness info just use !!g in the query search.marginalia.nu is a completely novel search engine written and hosted by one dude that aims to prioritize indexing lighter websites little to no javascript as these tend to be personal websites and homepages that have poor SEO and the big search engines won't index well. If you remember the internet of the early 2000s and want a nostalgia trip this ones for you Finally, YaCy is another completely novel search engine that uses p2p technology to power a big webcrawler which prioritizes indexes based off user queries and feedback. Everyone can download yacy and devote a bit of their computing power to help out a collective search engine. Companies can also download yacy and use it to index their private intranets. They have a public instance available through a web portal. Its not a great search engine for what most people want, which is quick and relevant information within the first few clicks. But it is an interesting use of technology and what a true honest-to-god community-operated search engine would look like untainted by SEO scores. I hope this has been informative to those who believe theres only a few options to pick from, I hate to be the 'bhut achthually' guy but know these options are so unknown to most people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem with all those search providers is: Someone still has to pay for infrastructure. You can either donate/pay for the service or accept ads and tracking. (I know that YaCy works a bit differently, but honestly even though I really like the idea of the system: This "novel" search engine is almost 20 years old now and never really worked very good.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Very true, there always being a cost somewhere is a general rule for all services in general. Its the reality of computer infrastructure that theres gotta be a computer/server somewhere eating bandwidth and energy, and someone with enough time + technical knowledge to maintain them. Those cost need to be offset either through donation or profit, or the service provider just has to eat the expenses and pay out of pocket. 'no cost actually' is in reference to the end users directly paying for something with direct money or collected private info sold to ad companies. In many public hosting instances for open source services most active users don't pay or donate at all and get to use the service without their info being sold. In these cases the expense is split between a few donations from better off charitable users and the rest is out of pocket from the sysadmin who most likely has a real job that pays well enough they can eat the hosting fees and not worry about it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FLX@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You're welcome 😎 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem with all those search providers is: Someone still has to pay for infrastructure. You can either donate/pay for the service or accept ads and tracking. (I know that YaCy works a bit differently, but honestly even though I really like the idea of the system: This "novel" search engine is almost 20 years old now and never really worked very good.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Very true, there always being a cost somewhere is a general rule for all services in general. Its the reality of computer infrastructure that theres gotta be a computer/server somewhere eating bandwidth and energy, and someone with enough time + technical knowledge to maintain them. Those cost need to be offset either through donation or profit, or the service provider just has to eat the expenses and pay out of pocket. 'no cost actually' is in reference to the end users directly paying for something with direct money or collected private info sold to ad companies. In many public hosting instances for open source services most active users don't pay or donate at all and get to use the service without their info being sold. In these cases the expense is split between a few donations from better off charitable users and the rest is out of pocket from the sysadmin who most likely has a real job that pays well enough they can eat the hosting fees and not worry about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Very true, there always being a cost somewhere is a general rule for all services in general. Its the reality of computer infrastructure that theres gotta be a computer/server somewhere eating bandwidth and energy, and someone with enough time + technical knowledge to maintain them. Those cost need to be offset either through donation or profit, or the service provider just has to eat the expenses and pay out of pocket. 'no cost actually' is in reference to the end users directly paying for something with direct money or collected private info sold to ad companies. In many public hosting instances for open source services most active users don't pay or donate at all and get to use the service without their info being sold. In these cases the expense is split between a few donations from better off charitable users and the rest is out of pocket from the sysadmin who most likely has a real job that pays well enough they can eat the hosting fees and not worry about it. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FLX@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You're welcome 😎 permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SCB@lemmy.world -7 points 2 years ago Your purchase is monumentally stupid and he's laughing at that permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FLX@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yet it would be interesting to hear, why this shocks you so much. :) Is it because you don't think search engines are a service worth paying for or because Google, Bing, DDG … are free? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FLX@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I'm not sure if this is really feasible (even though I'd be happy to see a working libre search engine). The problem I see is that a search engine is incredibly expensive to run, which makes it hard to maintain servers on a donation model. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yet it would be interesting to hear, why this shocks you so much. :) Is it because you don't think search engines are a service worth paying for or because Google, Bing, DDG … are free? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FLX@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I'm not sure if this is really feasible (even though I'd be happy to see a working libre search engine). The problem I see is that a search engine is incredibly expensive to run, which makes it hard to maintain servers on a donation model. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FLX@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I'm not sure if this is really feasible (even though I'd be happy to see a working libre search engine). The problem I see is that a search engine is incredibly expensive to run, which makes it hard to maintain servers on a donation model. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kungfuratte@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I'm not sure if this is really feasible (even though I'd be happy to see a working libre search engine). The problem I see is that a search engine is incredibly expensive to run, which makes it hard to maintain servers on a donation model. permalink fedilink source parent