Mozilla deletes promise to never sell Firefox data.

all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not to be a doomer, but it feels like the skill floor to protecting my privacy is unbearably high and getting higher. Does anyone have a good resource about it?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Just do one thing at a time. Here's my general process:

    1. switch email, and forward everything from the old one to the new one (I use my own domain name, but paid hosting)
    2. get into self-hosting, and slowly replace services I use w/ self-hosted ones
    3. get friends and family to switch to privacy-friendly services to communicate w/ me

    And so on. Just do one thing at a time, and continue until you're happy with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Not very private to put your name on a government list of gun owners.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's not needed in my state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Not everyone here lives in your state

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I was suggesting the OP may live in a similar state, using mine as an example.

    The assumption was: buying a gun = registration in a government database. That's not a valid assumption, so I provided a counter example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No, mostly because the main tenet of data security is that nobody should ever be trusted - not fully, at least.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I believe it's phrased, Trust AND Verify.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Trust but verify, if you're using the Russian axiom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wasn't aware of the Russian origin of the axiom. And it's been quoted to me, and I use "trust and verify." I see from wikipedia that it's a Russian proverb in Russian: доверяй, но проверяй, romanized: doveryay, no proveryay.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust,_but_verify

    I guess I'm neither a good Russian, nor a good Reaganite. Not in the least bit surprised to know this about myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    you should always use internet with zero trust

  • source
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • TL;DR - No trust. None. For anyone or anything.

    Extreme you say? Sure, maybe. But we've been burned so many times, yet we still say things like "oh but its convenient". That simply means most people dont care or dont have the time to deal with it, which is fair.

    I don't blame them, in this day and age, we have PLENTY to worry about, other than our online privacy and anonimity.

    Personally, I've went with the scorched earth approach. Foss, privacy respecting, self-hosted, encrypted. If I don't have control of it, I will keep it in a different place than the things I have control over.

    Unfortunately, for most, this comes at a very large technical overhead. Frankly, I don't see other ways forward. Look at france, sweeden, UK, they all want backdoors and the encryption keys to everything.

    The way forward will be trustless, self-hosted services. The next steps are to simply lower the technical bar, because even as a skilled engineer, sometines I hit my head against things that need a serious amount of figuring out.

    Making these services easy to host and use would be amazing. Trust nothing.

  • source