Researchers jailbreak a Tesla to get free in-car feature upgrades::A group of researchers found a way to hack a Tesla's hardware with the goal of getting free in-car upgrades, such as heated rear seats.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 231 points 3 years ago (2 children)

"you wouldn't download an in-car feature"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 225 points 3 years ago (15 children)

    I'm amazed that it's legal for a car company to sell you something, and then after you own it, remotely disable xyz aspects of the functionality unless you pay them more. How can that be legal? I own the car, it's MINE now, how can I not use every single thing that's in it?

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 131 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    Same reason it's legal for HP to brick your printer if you use third party ink. You violated their shitty TOS that none of us read because it's 80 pages of legalese, but you agreed to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    hmmm yes I suppose that's true. Okay so let me rephrase: I'm amazed it's legal for a car manufacturer to even HAVE a TOS like that when you purchase a car. It shouldn't be legal to write language like "you are purchasing this but agreeing that you can't use it" ... wtf?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Lets be fair

    TOSs you need two lawyers and an ai chatbot to explain to you, shouldnt be legal vs regular citizens.

    They cannot expect anyone to read all TOS they get thrown in their face throughout a lifetime. Let alone understand them. Its often not written super clearly and not all users can even read the language very well to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [+] 194 points 3 years ago (30 children)
  • load more comments (29 replies)
    [–] 124 points 3 years ago (12 children)

    good. software locks are anti human and anti consumer. everyone inherently feels ripped off by them, but the more capitalist minded think 'oh that's the company's right to do'

    if it's my property in my house I can fuck with it to do whatever I want

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 118 points 3 years ago

    Yes! Back to jailbreaking!

  • source
  • [–] 94 points 3 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 54 points 3 years ago* (10 children)

    Hardware companies trying to copy the software companies with a subscription model really sucks. What's next? Intel charging a monthly fee to unlock 5 GHz boost? Nvidia charging a monthly fee if you want to do anything AI-related with their GPUs? Samsung and LG charging a monthly fee if you want to use a TV or a monitor for more than 2 hours a day? Greed knows no bounds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • [–] 85 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    of course it was the PSP. I’ll say it again and again; secure computing is like adding a back door that you know about. Fuck intel me, fuck amd psp, fuck apple sep, fuck microsoft tpm, and fuck anyone who wants to have control over a device I own.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    Can somebody build & sell a dumb electric car? Or at least one not permanently internet-enabled and/or that has no functionality and capabilities locked behind software and subscriptions?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    Ive been genuinely thinking about getting into business selling dumb stuff exclusively. Dumb tvs, fridges, washers, phones, printers watever. Just a safe online vendor where you know that what you buy wont connect to the internet, need a subscription, or require a credit card on file to work. I just need a business name.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [+] 68 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] [B] 59 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A group of researchers said they have found a way to hack the hardware underpinning Tesla’s infotainment system, allowing them to get what normally would be paid upgrades — such as heated rear seats — for free.

    This may also give owners the ability to enable the self-driving and navigation system in regions where it’s normally not available, the researchers told TechCrunch, though they admitted that they haven’t tested these capabilities yet, as that would require more reverse engineering.

    “We are not the evil outsider, but we’re actually the insider, we own the car,” Werling told TechCrunch in an interview ahead of the conference.

    Werling explained that what they did was “fiddle around” with the supply voltage of the AMD processor that runs the infotainment system.

    With the same technique, the researchers said they were also able to extract the encryption key used to authenticate the car to Tesla’s network.


    I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 50 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 50 points 3 years ago

    Researchers jailbreak Tesla to allow usage of the entire car they purchased. FTFY

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    This looks to have already been discovered years ago as this company sells an OBD2 plug that can toggle all of this stuff, as well as highjacking some controls to add new functionality, as well as adding 50HP to those cars with a specific rear motor version https://ingenext.ca/products/ghost-upgrade

    Is this method software only? Because the upgrades on that site are pretty expensive and proprietary.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [+] 44 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    This is great. When you buy the car, you own it. I don’t care what kind of weird licenses and contracts they put together. If I buy the car and there is hardware in the car that allows for heated seats, there is no reason why I shouldn’t be able to enable it myself, tear it out, or do whatever I want with it. It is mine.

    I can understand there being safety concerns for modifying a car. But the owner of the car already accepts liability for the operation of that car. If I do not modify the car and I get into an accident due to Teslas auto pilot feature or another thing baked into their system, does Tesla accept liability? No, they do not. If it is my responsibility for the safe operation of the vehicle, then it is also my responsibility to modify a vehicle in a safe manner. 

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Never buying any car with this type of tech.

    If it's "our future" then I'll stick to used cars for life

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)

    "Researchers remove limits that shouldn't be there on features that are already part of the car"

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Elon's going to have a hissy fit

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago

    Can't imagine a bigger "fuck you" to give to the Muskrat... other than when Xtwitter finally implodes.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    "how to jailbreak your Mr coffee grinder and grind any beans you want!"

    "5 hacks to get your doorbell to keep working without a subscription!"

    "How to beat Microsoft Office drm to turn in assignments for free!"

    "4 clever ways to keep your AC running all summer long for free, no CC required! #3 will shock you!"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 3 years ago

    GOOD!! I despise it when hardware features are held at ransom!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›