top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 413 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Corporations: hey guys, let's unionize so the government doesn't exploit us.

Employees: hey, can we als...

Corporations: NO.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 229 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    every pirate related theme song getting increasingly louder in the background

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 212 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Just call it what it is: bribing power

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 141 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    streamers are currently being forced to reckon with their profitability — or lack thereof.

    Netflix's 2023 2nd quarter revenue: 8.1 billion dollars BTW

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (25 children)

    Brace yourself for a tidal wave of corporate apologists rushing to point out that “revenue isn’t profit!,!”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The number you're looking for is $1.49 billion in net income for Q2 2023.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Profit is the portion of revenue that is stolen from workers and given to shareholders. Profit is bad. Revenue is good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Unless you use that revenue to do stock buybacks, then it’s not considered profit but you still get to steal it from the workers. That way you can cry about unprofitability while all your shareholders and c suites crank up the exploitation of workers and consumers chasing “profitability” until the business collapses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (23 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 117 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    The slow march back to cable is unstoppable.

    Pirate everything. Share everything.

    Piracy is an access problem, not a consumer problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    dismantle capitalism. I bet in like 24 years some disruptor is going to come along and buy up rights to the shit thats on peacock Hulu etc now and offer 9 bucks a month to stream it to you. rinse repeat. fuck this corpo nightmare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 111 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Welcome back to the high seas mateys!

    🏴‍☠️

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 83 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If I’ve learned anything about corporate lobbying groups it’s that they only exist to fuck you and ruin any legislation that attempts to protect you from them.

    Eat shit SIA.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Get rid of them. Socialize their service. Host all content at media.gov and take costs out of taxes. We could pay artists more, have 0 ads, all for like $15 per paycheck. Those taxes would fund grants for artists and cover platform costs. No ads. No corporations.

    P.S. you already pay taxes on media through various 3 letter institutions and licensing. It's not different from what we have other than eliminating the things we all dont like.

    Watch the video. Benn Jordan has done a lot of the heavy lifting for us. This lobby exists to stop that from ever happening and nothing more. Fight them to the death.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 74 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Could they, instead, band together to offer a service that’s more user friendly than piracy? I suppose bribery is cheaper and easier.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 69 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Lobbying should be fucking banned.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 65 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The streaming market is splintered to max and oversaturated by content. The bubble already burst and now people are cordcutting again or fleeing to independent content. Absolutely nobody wants ads back and all companies do is push them on users for ever more revenue. The model only worked because it wasn't as inconvenient and full of ads as traditional paytv/cable.

    So now we've gone full circle and back to lobbies who at some point will undoubtedly create streaming-packages that will include a certain set of partenered services. Can't wait for the +1000€ per year -T-mobile-package-plan! Apart from Spotify who have kept their "affordable music streaming for 9.99€" promise over the last 10 years....the motion picture models have just become more expensive and user-unfriendly!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 56 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Streaming has ultimately taught me how little I 'need' to watch since it trains you to really only seek out a couple things per service. I've also become very advertisment sensitive being blessed with tools to avoid that and companies honeymooning people for a while with fewer ads compared to what cable did.

    Obviously, the dipshits are springing their 'trap' but I'm not bullish on the strategy of forcing consumers to suddenly tolerate a return of ads everywhere and always on entertainment. I just see folks running away again/further disconnecting from traditional media.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 55 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    "Guillotine sales soar as citizens band together for lobbying power"

    One can dream

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 54 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 51 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It felt inevitable at some point this was going to happen after they got caught off guard by the strikes to make sure that it never happens again, but the fight is not over yet.

    It's more important than ever then for you guys to support the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strike, fight for workers, and fight for unions.

    Otherwise, they'll just keep squeezing and squeezing, until there is nothing left.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 51 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Laws like the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), which features overly broad definitions of the platforms it targets and has troubling privacy implications thanks to surveillance requirements, could sweep companies like Netflix or Disney up into its dragnet.

    Streaming companies are usually pro-net neutrality, and that’s been a difficult concept for lawmakers and regulators in DC to fully grasp.

    For those that read just the headline. Not everything is black and white.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago

    Every now and again, their interests align with the average person.

    But make no mistake, the companies forming a coalition like this for one or two good causes won't make up for the long term damage it will no doubt cause.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Hello https://jellyfin.org, transmission, radarr and sickbeard

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I think this is why net neutrality is so important. Back in the days the electromagnetic spectrum was not as heavily regulated as it is now. Technically anyone with the technical know how could set up a broadcasting station. Then CBS, ABC, NBC all got together and did exactly what these companies are doing. They banded together to make it harder for the average person to get access to technology. This is their primariy goal. To give their companies priority at the network level (seconds matter) and also, most likely what they want is to 1. Find ways for their content to be regulated differently and be sold as network packages 2. Probably allow their content to be delivered through means that require people pay THEIR ISPs. Now, i will be honest. I have not read the article but i knlw this has been the intended goal for many years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    That's cool, I've kicked them all to the curb over the past two years.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Imagine missing the point so completely. Streaming, what a joke now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 2 years ago* (7 children)

    Checkout streamio

    You'll definitely stop paying these streaming giants.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [+] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago

    Incoming attempts to legislate recordless VPN bans and over the top piracy mitigation strategies instead of attempting to provide better services to their users

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Netflix and others look for power in number$.

    Welcome to the United $tate$ of America, people; Where money is the only thing that matters

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    That's called a cartel

  • source
  • [+] 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    You don't need a union, we are all family here.jpeg

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    This can only be a bad thing.

    They will win and like live nation, will merge with more well placed companies until they are printing their own money.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago*

    they have to since they can't make any money in the free market, because their products are total shit illegal sports streaming sites have better performance and usability than official/legal ones. corporate streaming services are a joke

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The new group is led by two former policymakers acting as senior advisers: former Republican Rep. Fred Upton and former Democratic Federal Communications Commission (FCC) acting chair Mignon Clyburn.

    Source: https://www.axios.com/2023/09/26/streamers-launch-first-official-trade-group

    Mignon Clyburn is Jim Clyburn's daughter. SMH

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›