top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 120 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Yeah like, I can understand a hesitation around being directly involved in a war effort, but mate once you’ve opened your system up to the military you’re kinda already there.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    He literally was paid a shit-ton of money by the pentagon to provide service to the Ukranian military. He took the money. And then he's like, "how could I have known they'd use it in WAR?"

    It's pretty obvious he got paid by the Russians to sabotage that operation. Which makes him an enemy agent against the US I guess since he sabotaged a military asset the US paid for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • He got paid to let Ukraine use starlink within Ukraines post 2014 borders to defend Ukraine land. Then when Ukraine tries to bomb a Russian navy fleet OUTSIDE OF UKRAINE'S BORDERS and it doesn't work everyone gets mad. I'm all for trashing Elon when it's due, and I trash him a lot, but he was literally playing by the established rules here.

    Had he let the Ukrainians bomb the fleet, he would have directly went against the US militaries orders. I get we all want Russia to stop and whatnot, but (and I hate that I'm the one defending him and saying this) Elon didn't do wrong here. The missles were flying correctly in starlink air, they hit the border, then stopped working. Also, this happened last year.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 104 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    Starlink is fucking fantastic, it's Elon Musk who's a sloppy Nazi cunt

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It does have some downsides (orbital clutter in particular) but conceptually I agree

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Orbital pollution and atmosphere pollution from the launches. All to avoid laying some fiber :/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I’d be ecstatic if ISPs laid more fiber where I live. But I’d be even happier if they laid any sort of internet cables at all to the outskirts of towns. Back where my family used to live (smaller town) there were plenty of houses on the outskirts of town that don’t have any internet unless they pay out the nose for satellite. It’s literally not worth the ISP’s money to lay any sort of cable out that way since there isn’t enough customer density for the amount of cable they’d need to lay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It doesn't really clutter orbits as they will deorbit unpowered in less than a decade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    the fact that there has to be a shitton of them is the clutter. Deorbiting them after their service life doesn't change the fact that at any one point there's a fuckton of satellites up there, messing up astronomy. And this is just the first of what will probably be several constellations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Yes but see...

    The users of starlink just pay for the costs Elon had to bring those satellites up there and keep them running.

    The global costs aka total costs on society will be payed by us all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ehhhhhh.

    Starlink has a major problem in durability as a result of the low orbit (required for low latency), meaning it's extremely expensive in upkeep.

    The satellites inability to talk to eachother, combined with the narrow transmission angle means the system scales very poorly and has numerous bottlenecks (both the satellite and the uplink station). Yes, Starlink is "working on it", but the laser-link solution is very complex in terms of engineering.

    Starlink has some amazing usecases, but those usecases can't possible cover the cost. It runs almost entirely on subsidies and venture capital.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sheeet, I never realised they can't talk to one another.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Using something I’ve built to destroy warships before they can launch cruise missiles at an apartment block?

    Now I am become death, saviour of civilian power grids.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    My le internet, it le networked interconnectively?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    What do you mean "my internet"?

    Internet was purposely developed for military goals.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Elon-Meme 😅

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›