you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It does have some downsides (orbital clutter in particular) but conceptually I agree

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Orbital pollution and atmosphere pollution from the launches. All to avoid laying some fiber :/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I’d be ecstatic if ISPs laid more fiber where I live. But I’d be even happier if they laid any sort of internet cables at all to the outskirts of towns. Back where my family used to live (smaller town) there were plenty of houses on the outskirts of town that don’t have any internet unless they pay out the nose for satellite. It’s literally not worth the ISP’s money to lay any sort of cable out that way since there isn’t enough customer density for the amount of cable they’d need to lay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don't use your Chinese propaganda for that.

    Almost every corner of Europe is capitalist as well, but they have better and faster (and sometimes even cheaper) internet than most of America.

    It's not capitalism, it's greed and bribery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Don't use your Chinese propaganda for that.

    Chinese propaganda? China is the most capitalistic countries of em all...

    It's not capitalism, it's greed and bribery.

    The government not building infrastructure and rather hand the task over to the private sector is not a problem of capitalism? Dude... It's a prime example of downsides of capitalism and it goes hand in hand with greed and bribery. Don't get me wrong because I think capitalism is a reality we live in and it has some upsides aswell.

    I live in Germany and we have very bad internet compared to some eastern European country's. That's because the conservative party decided in the 80s that our internet would have to use copper instead of fiber optic cables.

    20 years later we learned that decision was made because the private sector had huge interest in laying copper so they could sell cable TV.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Thats like saying wifi is just an excuse to avoid running some ethernet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It doesn't really clutter orbits as they will deorbit unpowered in less than a decade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    the fact that there has to be a shitton of them is the clutter. Deorbiting them after their service life doesn't change the fact that at any one point there's a fuckton of satellites up there, messing up astronomy. And this is just the first of what will probably be several constellations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Yes but see...

    The users of starlink just pay for the costs Elon had to bring those satellites up there and keep them running.

    The global costs aka total costs on society will be payed by us all.

  • source
  • parent