▲ 901 ▼ Starfield has been cracked (i.redd.it) submitted 2 years ago by Bloodyashes@lemm.ee to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 222 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Melonius@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) The game is kinda meh from what I've seen? Any positive impressions? permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ryepunk@hexbear.net 27 points 2 years ago (1 child) The most positive I've heard is that it is a by the numbers Bethesda rpg game. It doesn't try to be anything more. If you liked fallout 4 and skyrim odds are you'll like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago (5 children) What if I liked FO3 and New Vegas and hated FO4? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then you have good taste in games. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Qwaffle_waffle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What if I liked Fallout 76? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago Nobody's perfect. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kir@feddit.it 14 points 2 years ago Then you are objectively right permalink fedilink source parent [–] fox@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago FO3 was kind of a disaster in terms of narrative and roleplay. And the established world building. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* Then wait a few months and check some of the in-depth reviews before investing your time. Bethesda's most well known for its looter shooters with RPG styling. I imagine this will follow in similar footsteps. It'll be well designed, well armed, but it's not going to be an RPG where your decisions have lasting impact. But hopefully I'm wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* They got rid of the dialogue wheel and went back to a list of options (influenced by character background / skills), so at least there's that, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Still downloading for me, but I see more than one review saying it takes a long time to get good. I'm keeping my expectations low. EDIT: Glad I was warned it starts slow. It does get better if you stick with it. EDIT 2: It entertained me for a week. It's no Skyrim, or even Fallout. I would have been pissed if I'd paid for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] TechnoBabble@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Awoo@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* Starfield really does look and run great. Run great? Absolutely not. I get 120fps in Elden Ring at medium, 2070, 64gb ram, i9-12900k. Just got done with Armored Core, rock solid 144fps at medium all the way through, never a blip. This runs at 30fps on lowest settings. It runs like absolute crap. It's incredibly jarring to go from games that are gorgeous and well made with high performance to this thing running like something 20 years ago. Absolutely zero optimisation. It will get a seriously negative response from the average pc user when user reviews start hitting due to this performance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So it's more Destiny than No Man's Sky. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Best comparison I've heard (by Gopher, if I recall correctly) is Outer Worlds, but less silly, and bigger by several orders of magnitude. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Yeah Outer Worlds was awesome but very limited. So limited that it almost felt linear. permalink fedilink source parent [–] OptimusPrimeRib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago I’ve heard nothing but good things about gameplay. But it runs like shit on most systems. A RTX 3080 at 1440p ultra can’t get 60 fps in cities. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ryepunk@hexbear.net 27 points 2 years ago (1 child) The most positive I've heard is that it is a by the numbers Bethesda rpg game. It doesn't try to be anything more. If you liked fallout 4 and skyrim odds are you'll like this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago (5 children) What if I liked FO3 and New Vegas and hated FO4? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then you have good taste in games. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Qwaffle_waffle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What if I liked Fallout 76? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago Nobody's perfect. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kir@feddit.it 14 points 2 years ago Then you are objectively right permalink fedilink source parent [–] fox@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago FO3 was kind of a disaster in terms of narrative and roleplay. And the established world building. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* Then wait a few months and check some of the in-depth reviews before investing your time. Bethesda's most well known for its looter shooters with RPG styling. I imagine this will follow in similar footsteps. It'll be well designed, well armed, but it's not going to be an RPG where your decisions have lasting impact. But hopefully I'm wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* They got rid of the dialogue wheel and went back to a list of options (influenced by character background / skills), so at least there's that, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago (5 children) What if I liked FO3 and New Vegas and hated FO4? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then you have good taste in games. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Qwaffle_waffle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What if I liked Fallout 76? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago Nobody's perfect. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kir@feddit.it 14 points 2 years ago Then you are objectively right permalink fedilink source parent [–] fox@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago FO3 was kind of a disaster in terms of narrative and roleplay. And the established world building. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* Then wait a few months and check some of the in-depth reviews before investing your time. Bethesda's most well known for its looter shooters with RPG styling. I imagine this will follow in similar footsteps. It'll be well designed, well armed, but it's not going to be an RPG where your decisions have lasting impact. But hopefully I'm wrong permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* They got rid of the dialogue wheel and went back to a list of options (influenced by character background / skills), so at least there's that, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then you have good taste in games. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Qwaffle_waffle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What if I liked Fallout 76? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago Nobody's perfect. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Qwaffle_waffle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) What if I liked Fallout 76? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago Nobody's perfect. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago Nobody's perfect. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kir@feddit.it 14 points 2 years ago Then you are objectively right permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fox@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago FO3 was kind of a disaster in terms of narrative and roleplay. And the established world building. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago* Then wait a few months and check some of the in-depth reviews before investing your time. Bethesda's most well known for its looter shooters with RPG styling. I imagine this will follow in similar footsteps. It'll be well designed, well armed, but it's not going to be an RPG where your decisions have lasting impact. But hopefully I'm wrong permalink fedilink source parent
[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* They got rid of the dialogue wheel and went back to a list of options (influenced by character background / skills), so at least there's that, I suppose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Still downloading for me, but I see more than one review saying it takes a long time to get good. I'm keeping my expectations low. EDIT: Glad I was warned it starts slow. It does get better if you stick with it. EDIT 2: It entertained me for a week. It's no Skyrim, or even Fallout. I would have been pissed if I'd paid for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] TechnoBabble@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Awoo@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* Starfield really does look and run great. Run great? Absolutely not. I get 120fps in Elden Ring at medium, 2070, 64gb ram, i9-12900k. Just got done with Armored Core, rock solid 144fps at medium all the way through, never a blip. This runs at 30fps on lowest settings. It runs like absolute crap. It's incredibly jarring to go from games that are gorgeous and well made with high performance to this thing running like something 20 years ago. Absolutely zero optimisation. It will get a seriously negative response from the average pc user when user reviews start hitting due to this performance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So it's more Destiny than No Man's Sky. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Best comparison I've heard (by Gopher, if I recall correctly) is Outer Worlds, but less silly, and bigger by several orders of magnitude. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Yeah Outer Worlds was awesome but very limited. So limited that it almost felt linear. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] TechnoBabble@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Awoo@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* Starfield really does look and run great. Run great? Absolutely not. I get 120fps in Elden Ring at medium, 2070, 64gb ram, i9-12900k. Just got done with Armored Core, rock solid 144fps at medium all the way through, never a blip. This runs at 30fps on lowest settings. It runs like absolute crap. It's incredibly jarring to go from games that are gorgeous and well made with high performance to this thing running like something 20 years ago. Absolutely zero optimisation. It will get a seriously negative response from the average pc user when user reviews start hitting due to this performance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So it's more Destiny than No Man's Sky. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Best comparison I've heard (by Gopher, if I recall correctly) is Outer Worlds, but less silly, and bigger by several orders of magnitude. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Yeah Outer Worlds was awesome but very limited. So limited that it almost felt linear. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* Starfield really does look and run great. Run great? Absolutely not. I get 120fps in Elden Ring at medium, 2070, 64gb ram, i9-12900k. Just got done with Armored Core, rock solid 144fps at medium all the way through, never a blip. This runs at 30fps on lowest settings. It runs like absolute crap. It's incredibly jarring to go from games that are gorgeous and well made with high performance to this thing running like something 20 years ago. Absolutely zero optimisation. It will get a seriously negative response from the average pc user when user reviews start hitting due to this performance. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So it's more Destiny than No Man's Sky. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Best comparison I've heard (by Gopher, if I recall correctly) is Outer Worlds, but less silly, and bigger by several orders of magnitude. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Yeah Outer Worlds was awesome but very limited. So limited that it almost felt linear. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] leftzero@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Best comparison I've heard (by Gopher, if I recall correctly) is Outer Worlds, but less silly, and bigger by several orders of magnitude. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Yeah Outer Worlds was awesome but very limited. So limited that it almost felt linear. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Yeah Outer Worlds was awesome but very limited. So limited that it almost felt linear. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OptimusPrimeRib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago I’ve heard nothing but good things about gameplay. But it runs like shit on most systems. A RTX 3080 at 1440p ultra can’t get 60 fps in cities. permalink fedilink source parent
