▲ 221 ▼ Adversarial images on clothing to combat AI facial recognition without covering the face (petapixel.com) submitted 2 years ago by listless@lemmy.cringecollective.io to c/privacy@lemmy.ml 54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 54 points 2 years ago (2 children) Unfortunatly its a cat and mouse game. Except the cat is a easily deployable software problem and the mouse is buy new clothing hardware problem. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) Led clothing anyone? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) they've been around for some time now: https://www.reflectacles.com Ghost uses a frame-applied material that reflects both infrared and visible light. In low light environments they will maintain your privacy on cameras using infrared for illumination and also block 3D infrared facial mapping during both day & night. The visible light reflection can make you anonymous in images/videos using a flash in low light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago Ghost is $170 (US, I'm assuming). Not great but not bad for a wicked cool looking pair of sunglasses. Considering Ray-Bans are around $200 (and, no offense, look like they're from Tesco), and that Ghost are privacy focused, I'd say that price seems not that bad. Still high, though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago (2 children) If its radioactive then it will disrupt the image sensor. It mist also disrupt your dna but u dont need that do ya. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Light emitting diode (screens sewn on fabric) not lead lined 😁 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago Fuck im retarded. But maybe a automated laser targeting system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I guess I'll just wear radium paint then. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) If they can target the underlying architecture of the models like nightshade does, it will actually be quite hard to deal with for the surveillance companies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Interesting concept if we can target and poison the definatly stolen training data. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) Led clothing anyone? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] merde@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) they've been around for some time now: https://www.reflectacles.com Ghost uses a frame-applied material that reflects both infrared and visible light. In low light environments they will maintain your privacy on cameras using infrared for illumination and also block 3D infrared facial mapping during both day & night. The visible light reflection can make you anonymous in images/videos using a flash in low light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago Ghost is $170 (US, I'm assuming). Not great but not bad for a wicked cool looking pair of sunglasses. Considering Ray-Bans are around $200 (and, no offense, look like they're from Tesco), and that Ghost are privacy focused, I'd say that price seems not that bad. Still high, though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago (2 children) If its radioactive then it will disrupt the image sensor. It mist also disrupt your dna but u dont need that do ya. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Light emitting diode (screens sewn on fabric) not lead lined 😁 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago Fuck im retarded. But maybe a automated laser targeting system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I guess I'll just wear radium paint then. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) they've been around for some time now: https://www.reflectacles.com Ghost uses a frame-applied material that reflects both infrared and visible light. In low light environments they will maintain your privacy on cameras using infrared for illumination and also block 3D infrared facial mapping during both day & night. The visible light reflection can make you anonymous in images/videos using a flash in low light. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago Ghost is $170 (US, I'm assuming). Not great but not bad for a wicked cool looking pair of sunglasses. Considering Ray-Bans are around $200 (and, no offense, look like they're from Tesco), and that Ghost are privacy focused, I'd say that price seems not that bad. Still high, though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago Ghost is $170 (US, I'm assuming). Not great but not bad for a wicked cool looking pair of sunglasses. Considering Ray-Bans are around $200 (and, no offense, look like they're from Tesco), and that Ghost are privacy focused, I'd say that price seems not that bad. Still high, though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago (2 children) If its radioactive then it will disrupt the image sensor. It mist also disrupt your dna but u dont need that do ya. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Light emitting diode (screens sewn on fabric) not lead lined 😁 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago Fuck im retarded. But maybe a automated laser targeting system. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I guess I'll just wear radium paint then. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Light emitting diode (screens sewn on fabric) not lead lined 😁 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago Fuck im retarded. But maybe a automated laser targeting system. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago Fuck im retarded. But maybe a automated laser targeting system. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I guess I'll just wear radium paint then. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) If they can target the underlying architecture of the models like nightshade does, it will actually be quite hard to deal with for the surveillance companies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Interesting concept if we can target and poison the definatly stolen training data. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Interesting concept if we can target and poison the definatly stolen training data. permalink fedilink source parent