▲ 1949 ▼ Sweet tea (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 252 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] psud@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Sure, but so few people are high energy athletes who can legitimately burn the sugar right away. My comment was really about the great majority of people for whom sugar consumption is a path to metabolic disease, diabetes, and early death I still support a tax on sugar as it would reduce consumption overall, but for those wealthy enough to exercise hard a sugar tax would hardly hurt permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xohshoo@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Wealthy enough to exercise? Wtf? Ain’t even going there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psud@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It's probably a U shaped curve where you can devote (or have to devote) significant time to exercise at very low incomes, but it becomes harder at working poor sort of levels, then easy again at a certain level above poverty permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xohshoo@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Wealthy enough to exercise? Wtf? Ain’t even going there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] psud@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It's probably a U shaped curve where you can devote (or have to devote) significant time to exercise at very low incomes, but it becomes harder at working poor sort of levels, then easy again at a certain level above poverty permalink fedilink source parent
[–] psud@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It's probably a U shaped curve where you can devote (or have to devote) significant time to exercise at very low incomes, but it becomes harder at working poor sort of levels, then easy again at a certain level above poverty permalink fedilink source parent