alt-text: Woman ordering food (photo): “I would like to buy a hamburger for the same price that it was 2 hours ago.”

Cashier (sketched): “Sir, this is a Wendy's”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 106 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I actually like Wendy's, but if they implement this at my local store I'm boycotting. The cost for you to make the food per item doesn't fucking change if there's 1 person in line or 100, just the wait time. It's pure profiteering.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The effort the employee has to put forth to meet demand changes during a rush, not that they will see a penny of the higher revenue they are directly responsible for generating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It changes in that there are economies of scale involved. It actually becomes cheaper and more efficient for the company to make 20 cheeseburgers at once than just one. That’s why this surge pricing thing is a joke. Would the company really like to introduce friction to customers buying more food?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Only way I can make any sense of it is to try balance the day. Get more business on quiet time, and less on rush hour. But I don't get how it would make any sense from the business perspective since usually you'd want to optimize for the rush hour, not push customers away with higher pricing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'll just demand everything be made to order and be fresh. I encourage everyone to do the same and tank their numbers. If they're going to charge extra during peak hours then you bet your ass I'm demanding fries fresh out of the frier and burgers right off the grill. I can wait 3 minutes for the fries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That’s how you end up with spit in your burger.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And a lawsuit. What's your point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That’s how you end up with spit in your burger.

    ^ This.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What happens? They change the prices throughout the day?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    They announced they will be switching to surge pricing. If there are a lot of people trying to get burgers, they'll increase the price of burgers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Fucking LOL. When are we going to start rioting against all this bullshit?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Rioting won't work, you talk with your money. The only thing capitalism cares about is your labor and consumption....that's it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Let's put "surge pricing" in quotes to make it clear that it's some bullshit they just made up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean, I don’t think the entire concept is flawed. I want to wait and see what it actually means - especially if it’s cheaper to grab food outside of surge hours.

    I understand it likely won’t be, but I won’t damn them until we have more information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    especially if it’s cheaper to grab food outside of surge hours.

    you really don't understand how corporations work, do you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    It’s not impossible.

    It’s not probable, but why not wait to damn them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Even if it started out that way, where "surge" pricing is current pricing and "off-surge" pricing is cheaper, leading to consumers paying less overall, it won't stay that way. It would only be that way to prime consumers mentally to accept that dynamic pricing. After which they'll slowly increase prices, 10 cents or whatever every month. Soon enough it'll cost more and the corporation can brag about how it increased profits again this quarter. Remember publicly traded companies are legally obligated to maximize profit - the only time they aren't doing so is when they're burning money to prime consumers to accept bullshit or building a captive base, in order to eventually maximize profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • because there's no need to wait, corporations are predictable... it does not matter how much they say they care about quality or the consumer. they will fuck over every single person on the planet at a moment's notice if it means 0.15% additional profit.

  • source
  • parent