▲ 70 ▼ This is the way (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 years ago by Jenoki@lemmy.ml to c/piracy@lemmy.ml 47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Xirup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (4 children) Dumb question, why? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because 200% should be your minimum, not your max. 🤌🏼 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) permalink fedilink source parent [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZeroEcks@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That's the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] jeffreyosborne@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago yo momma🤌🏿 permalink fedilink source parent [–] NateSwift@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago It will lead to the torrent dying if everyone stops seeding permalink fedilink source parent [–] blindsight@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) If there are less than 5 seeds, then I keep seeding indefinitely. Above that, I'll consider deleting it to free up space once I'm done with the media. Unless it's from a private tracker, in which case I'll just seed everything forever to get the sweet bonus points. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) How does that work, does the downloader just cycling though seeding torrents or do they all stay active? I feel like there would be so much torrents over time it would slow everything down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I looked it up, and qBittorrent can easily handle hundreds of torrents, apparently. I haven't noticed any problems running 180-ish. I'll probably try to keep it capped to 300 or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Does it matter how many files are in each torrent? I would think a 100 file torrent would be more intensive than a 3 file torrent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago I don't think it has any effect at all, but I'm not an expert. It's just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn't it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because 200% should be your minimum, not your max. 🤌🏼 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZeroEcks@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That's the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] jeffreyosborne@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago yo momma🤌🏿 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZeroEcks@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That's the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] jeffreyosborne@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago yo momma🤌🏿 permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That's the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] jeffreyosborne@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago yo momma🤌🏿 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That's the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] jeffreyosborne@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago yo momma🤌🏿 permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Rustmilian@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NateSwift@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago It will lead to the torrent dying if everyone stops seeding permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) If there are less than 5 seeds, then I keep seeding indefinitely. Above that, I'll consider deleting it to free up space once I'm done with the media. Unless it's from a private tracker, in which case I'll just seed everything forever to get the sweet bonus points. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) How does that work, does the downloader just cycling though seeding torrents or do they all stay active? I feel like there would be so much torrents over time it would slow everything down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I looked it up, and qBittorrent can easily handle hundreds of torrents, apparently. I haven't noticed any problems running 180-ish. I'll probably try to keep it capped to 300 or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Does it matter how many files are in each torrent? I would think a 100 file torrent would be more intensive than a 3 file torrent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago I don't think it has any effect at all, but I'm not an expert. It's just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn't it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) How does that work, does the downloader just cycling though seeding torrents or do they all stay active? I feel like there would be so much torrents over time it would slow everything down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I looked it up, and qBittorrent can easily handle hundreds of torrents, apparently. I haven't noticed any problems running 180-ish. I'll probably try to keep it capped to 300 or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Does it matter how many files are in each torrent? I would think a 100 file torrent would be more intensive than a 3 file torrent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago I don't think it has any effect at all, but I'm not an expert. It's just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn't it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I looked it up, and qBittorrent can easily handle hundreds of torrents, apparently. I haven't noticed any problems running 180-ish. I'll probably try to keep it capped to 300 or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Does it matter how many files are in each torrent? I would think a 100 file torrent would be more intensive than a 3 file torrent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago I don't think it has any effect at all, but I'm not an expert. It's just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn't it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Does it matter how many files are in each torrent? I would think a 100 file torrent would be more intensive than a 3 file torrent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago I don't think it has any effect at all, but I'm not an expert. It's just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn't it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago I don't think it has any effect at all, but I'm not an expert. It's just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn't it? permalink fedilink source parent