you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I mostly agree with you, except:

Visual storytelling requires intention that AI can't provide.

It should be "that AI can't provide yet". The intent can be provided via elaborate prompts. It is just that the output from current generative AI isn't up to that level yet.

Give it 5 years, and AI might be able to do what you mentioned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    I don't think an AI will ever achieve new things like the dolly zoom or bullet time. AI can replicate these things once they already exist, but humans are brilliantly absurd and we make strange new art all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    AI can create new ideas or solve problems that humans haven’t solved before, right? Don’t you think it might be possible someday for it to do the same with cinematography?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago*

    I said foreseeable future in my initial comment for a reason. Someday it may help sure, but even into more advanced AIs I think a hybrid of human input and generative input will give more relatable and expressive result than AI alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    What about the 2015 Go games between AlphaGo and Lee Sedol?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlphaGo_versus_Lee_Sedol

    "Many top Go players characterized AlphaGo's unorthodox plays as seemingly-questionable moves that initially befuddled onlookers, but made sense in hindsight:[72] "All but the very best Go players craft their style by imitating top players. AlphaGo seems to have totally original moves it creates itself."[68]"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments