▲ 2689 ▼ Firefox is the only way. (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by Spudwart@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml 363 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 years ago (3 children) NoScript 🤌🏻 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] persolb@lemmy.ml 46 points 3 years ago (4 children) I love it in theory… but it just broke so many websites I needed to use. And not always in obvious ways. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) uBlock does this occasionally as well. Still worth it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] persolb@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago UBlock is much more reliable than no script in my experience. It’s also usually obvious when it breaks; no script sometimes isn’t obvious until you hit submit and notice none of what you typed actually got sent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Then just put those sites on your trust list? You can go through all the sites the initial HTTP request calls out to and decide which ones get a pass. This is how I ensure sites like gstatic, googletagmanager, etc. don't collect data even though the rest of the site works. If that's too much, just open the flood gates for that site and trust everything there. At least it isn't just sending all your data out by DEFAULT. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) That still breaks a lot of sites. For example, Wikipedia gets broken if you click any link and then navigate back. NoScript is just crap. If you want to actually block scripts for something without breaking everything else, use DevTools. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hai@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago You can use Wikiless, an alternative frontend for Wikipedia which doesn't have JavaScript, and LibRedirect. permalink fedilink source parent [–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I call bs. I am not experiencing that on mobile or desktop this behavior you're describing. NoScript does not break Wikipedia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It does it on my phone. 100% repeatable. permalink fedilink source parent [–] gammasfor@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yeah these days literally every website uses JavaScript in some format as modern reactive design is easier to do if you can execute client side code. Blocking JavaScript is a sledgehammer solution to the problem. permalink fedilink source parent [–] OfficerBribe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Same here. I used NoScript in the past and remembering whitelisting way too often so dumped it in the end. Now I just use uBlock with I think some built-in javascript block of known bad hosts. permalink fedilink source parent [–] vii@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 years ago You can use Ublock Origin in advanced mode, which allows you to block, blacklist/whitelist scripts. permalink fedilink source parent [–] exu@feditown.com 8 points 2 years ago uBlock Origin can act as adblocker plus NoScript combined if you enable advanced mode. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] persolb@lemmy.ml 46 points 3 years ago (4 children) I love it in theory… but it just broke so many websites I needed to use. And not always in obvious ways. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) uBlock does this occasionally as well. Still worth it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] persolb@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago UBlock is much more reliable than no script in my experience. It’s also usually obvious when it breaks; no script sometimes isn’t obvious until you hit submit and notice none of what you typed actually got sent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Then just put those sites on your trust list? You can go through all the sites the initial HTTP request calls out to and decide which ones get a pass. This is how I ensure sites like gstatic, googletagmanager, etc. don't collect data even though the rest of the site works. If that's too much, just open the flood gates for that site and trust everything there. At least it isn't just sending all your data out by DEFAULT. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) That still breaks a lot of sites. For example, Wikipedia gets broken if you click any link and then navigate back. NoScript is just crap. If you want to actually block scripts for something without breaking everything else, use DevTools. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hai@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago You can use Wikiless, an alternative frontend for Wikipedia which doesn't have JavaScript, and LibRedirect. permalink fedilink source parent [–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I call bs. I am not experiencing that on mobile or desktop this behavior you're describing. NoScript does not break Wikipedia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It does it on my phone. 100% repeatable. permalink fedilink source parent [–] gammasfor@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yeah these days literally every website uses JavaScript in some format as modern reactive design is easier to do if you can execute client side code. Blocking JavaScript is a sledgehammer solution to the problem. permalink fedilink source parent [–] OfficerBribe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Same here. I used NoScript in the past and remembering whitelisting way too often so dumped it in the end. Now I just use uBlock with I think some built-in javascript block of known bad hosts. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) uBlock does this occasionally as well. Still worth it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] persolb@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago UBlock is much more reliable than no script in my experience. It’s also usually obvious when it breaks; no script sometimes isn’t obvious until you hit submit and notice none of what you typed actually got sent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] persolb@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago UBlock is much more reliable than no script in my experience. It’s also usually obvious when it breaks; no script sometimes isn’t obvious until you hit submit and notice none of what you typed actually got sent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Then just put those sites on your trust list? You can go through all the sites the initial HTTP request calls out to and decide which ones get a pass. This is how I ensure sites like gstatic, googletagmanager, etc. don't collect data even though the rest of the site works. If that's too much, just open the flood gates for that site and trust everything there. At least it isn't just sending all your data out by DEFAULT. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) That still breaks a lot of sites. For example, Wikipedia gets broken if you click any link and then navigate back. NoScript is just crap. If you want to actually block scripts for something without breaking everything else, use DevTools. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hai@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago You can use Wikiless, an alternative frontend for Wikipedia which doesn't have JavaScript, and LibRedirect. permalink fedilink source parent [–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I call bs. I am not experiencing that on mobile or desktop this behavior you're describing. NoScript does not break Wikipedia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It does it on my phone. 100% repeatable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aux@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) That still breaks a lot of sites. For example, Wikipedia gets broken if you click any link and then navigate back. NoScript is just crap. If you want to actually block scripts for something without breaking everything else, use DevTools. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hai@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago You can use Wikiless, an alternative frontend for Wikipedia which doesn't have JavaScript, and LibRedirect. permalink fedilink source parent [–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I call bs. I am not experiencing that on mobile or desktop this behavior you're describing. NoScript does not break Wikipedia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It does it on my phone. 100% repeatable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hai@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago You can use Wikiless, an alternative frontend for Wikipedia which doesn't have JavaScript, and LibRedirect. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) I call bs. I am not experiencing that on mobile or desktop this behavior you're describing. NoScript does not break Wikipedia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It does it on my phone. 100% repeatable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago It does it on my phone. 100% repeatable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gammasfor@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Yeah these days literally every website uses JavaScript in some format as modern reactive design is easier to do if you can execute client side code. Blocking JavaScript is a sledgehammer solution to the problem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OfficerBribe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Same here. I used NoScript in the past and remembering whitelisting way too often so dumped it in the end. Now I just use uBlock with I think some built-in javascript block of known bad hosts. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vii@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 years ago You can use Ublock Origin in advanced mode, which allows you to block, blacklist/whitelist scripts. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] exu@feditown.com 8 points 2 years ago uBlock Origin can act as adblocker plus NoScript combined if you enable advanced mode. permalink fedilink source parent