you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's kind of fair, to be honest, and the "no big corporation" seems more like a pro than a con

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Eh, it is a con when there are problems, service problems, bugs, etc...

    My instance have had a few of them and for a while our 1 admin was unavailable.

    It is difficult or impossible to get it resolve because there is no contact point, nobody hired to fix issues that need immediate triage, etc... which can result in longer outages or bugs on specific instances.

    I'm not complaining. This is a fantastic service that is being offered completely free from actual altruistic incentives, unlike corporations. There are a few downsides though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Definitely, that's why I always prefer instances with at least two admins, and a Matrix room for status updates

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's great and all.

    But feddit.de just became usable again after more than two weeks of being basically unusable - because the 19.0 and 19.1 releases of Lemmy were buggy and there was no downgrade migration possible on the database. No big corporation would break their product for two weeks like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Seems okay at the moment, at least !europe@feddit.de properly federates

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah, true. It seems like that is a pro that greatly overshadows the cons. Like someone else pointed out, it's just worded weirdly in the article.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Kind of funny how the privacy crowd is big on Lemmy but it skips over the fact that all of its Lemmy data is hosted on the machines of people that have no accountability...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You're always free to spin up your own server and host it if you're concerned about the way your data is being handled. Not something you can do with the corporate alternatives

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    But as soon as you interact with literally anyone (or anyone interacts with you) your data is still replicated on other servers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Your posts are all public and discoverable by web crawlers even if your instance didn’t federate at all. That’s kind of the point of activityPUB

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    How about private messages which are also unencrypted?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    ActivityPub does not have support for private messages. Services that try to shoehorn a direct message as "private" are misusing the protocol. You could configure client-side encryption but thats outside the scope of ActivityPub

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I may be naive, but even though I don't personally know my admin, this is a person who has a stellar reputation, and who I'd trust far more than some massive corporation that has to abide(1) by some anemic laws

    (1)if it finds it profitable to do so

  • source
  • parent