▲ 658 ▼ The 4 best Reddit alternatives: Top picks to replace your subreddits - Lemmy is listed first! (www.androidpolice.com) submitted 2 years ago by Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de to c/fediverse@lemmy.world 156 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Your posts are all public and discoverable by web crawlers even if your instance didn’t federate at all. That’s kind of the point of activityPUB permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) How about private messages which are also unencrypted? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) ActivityPub does not have support for private messages. Services that try to shoehorn a direct message as "private" are misusing the protocol. You could configure client-side encryption but thats outside the scope of ActivityPub permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago That's true, but neither the article nor the discussion are about ActivityPub. Both are specifically about Lemmy, and Lemmy does have private messages. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) How about private messages which are also unencrypted? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) ActivityPub does not have support for private messages. Services that try to shoehorn a direct message as "private" are misusing the protocol. You could configure client-side encryption but thats outside the scope of ActivityPub permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago That's true, but neither the article nor the discussion are about ActivityPub. Both are specifically about Lemmy, and Lemmy does have private messages. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) ActivityPub does not have support for private messages. Services that try to shoehorn a direct message as "private" are misusing the protocol. You could configure client-side encryption but thats outside the scope of ActivityPub permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago That's true, but neither the article nor the discussion are about ActivityPub. Both are specifically about Lemmy, and Lemmy does have private messages. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago That's true, but neither the article nor the discussion are about ActivityPub. Both are specifically about Lemmy, and Lemmy does have private messages. permalink fedilink source parent