you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 76 points 3 years ago (1 child)

I remember fondly playing overwatch 1 with my friends and sinking in hundreds of hours. If they wanted to break into the steam market they should have done it with the first one. Not with their lackluster, phoned in sequel. This was just stupid of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Let's be real, Overwatch 2 was an update patch that they tried to sell as a sequel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 years ago

    An update implies they changed something to the game. This was just an update to the monetization. A blatant pure cash grab sold as a sequel game. Its a travesty, and if they had any decency they'd scrap it, apologize, and release "Overwatch 2 A Realm Reborn" that is an actual legitimate sequel to the original game.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I loved Assassin's Creed 2, so I didn't bat an eye buying Brotherhood and Revelations as they had the same basic background. They were full price games and I played for about 15 to 20 hours on each. That's not much for full price. They were basically just new story lines for the main game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    You can still play Assassin's Creed 2

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago*

    Personally, I sometimes like when a game feels like just a new storyline (and map) for the same game. Sometimes I just want more of a good thing and don't want to have to learn new mechanics or risk the game making things worse.

    And since dev time is limited, I think in theory, this could mean more time could be spent on making the story missions perfect. But in practice, I don't think that usually happens. Publishers would rather cheap out.

  • source
  • parent