Those seem incompatible to me.

(UBI means Universal Basic Income, giving everyone a basic income, for free)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I can manage financially with 2 days of work a week, and I'm now at a point where I would not want to scale back because my work would become of lower quality. Every Monday would be like coming back from a vacation, and I think I'd lose touch and feel with the job.

Those 5 days weekend sure give me time for personally enriching hobbies!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Society couldn't function if most people worked like you. I'm happy for you and it's the exact place I want to be but I think its only possible in our current framework.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    With increasing automation, it could totally work soon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Also, a fair bit of work is work for the sake of work. It doesn’t enrich society, just the capitalism machine. So if UBI were enacted on a large scale, there is plenty of unnecessary work that can go by the wayside.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It actually could. Imagine if salary had increased in accordance to the productivity boosts that automation has brought. Then you could have 3 people, working 2 days a week, sharing a job and being able to live from it. After all, it used to take more than 3 people to do the work a single person does nowadays.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why would a business pay for these things that make their workers more efficient and then relinquish all of the profit that came from making things more efficient?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments