I’m the chimney sweep now!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 57 points 2 years ago (8 children)

But we already got rid of child chimney sweepers without getting rid of capitalism

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    The point is that capitalism prioritizes profit, not the welfare of people. This is only not done anymore because of regulation, not because capitalism was fixed. It can't be fixed. The target goal of capitalism is wrong. Profit does not optimize for innovation, welfare, happiness, or anything else that could be called good. It will always exploit people as much as it can, and it just happens to not exploit children (in the western world (legally)) because we made it not allowed, and disobeying that law would be less profitable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Seems like regulations are the fix.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    shouldn't we come up with a system where the core values don't need regulation. it becomes unthinkable to exploit children not because of regulation and enforcement but because the system in itself denies power to exploiters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (17 replies)
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don't worry give some states a couple of years and I'm sure we'll see child chimney sweepers come back 😉

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    Businesses in the Midwest US have already been hiring 10-12 year old undocumented kids to work overnight cleaning machine parts at meatpacking plants. I mean… so many different things wrong with that. The psycho fuckers who run these businesses need some real penalties, like jail time and dissolving their company.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We just got rid of chimney sweeps in general.

    Despite us regulating child labor it seems like profit motives and greed overpower regulatory measures.

    https://www.npr.org/2023/02/26/1157368469/child-labor-violations-increase-states-loosen-rules

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    Through labor organization. It wasn't out of the goodness of the hearts of benevolent Capitalists, but through struggles of Workers. The point of this picture isn't that Capitalism used to be worse, and fixed itself, but that Capitalists will absolutely take advantage of children and subject them to sacrificing their bodies for clean chimneys if it makes a profit.

    The takeaway from this is that Capitalists cannot be seen as individual humans with values, but as cogs in the Capitalist machine that will exploit everything and everyone for profit. An individual Capitalist may not be willing to go that far, but inevitably as long as there is profit to be made, someone will fill that gap.

    That's why economic systems need to be looked at at aggregates and not as individual transactions. You miss the forest for the trees.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    we just moved child labour to less developed countries. we didn't get rid of anything. you just don't see it, but child labour is still going strong in the world. child slavery as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    No WE did not. The people in those countries where it still happens allowed it to still happen.

    None of us have any decisionmaking power to control what those countries do, so the burden to fix those problems is on those countries who allow it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's 100% a consequence of Capitalism, though. You're blaming developing nations for the willful exploitation international Corporations commit and you personally benefit from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    That's just your opinion. The fact is that those developing nations should have child labor laws in place, and proper enforcement of those laws to prevent children from being exploited. The blame belongs squarely on those who allow it, and I reject any personal responsibility for any of that because I have no control over the laws of any country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    It is not my opinion that international corporations brutally exploit the third world, it's a fact. It is also not my opinion that Capitalism leads to this, the profit motive inevitably leads to it.

    You claiming that developing nations should just fight against international corporations brutally exploiting them and absolving yourself of any responsibility you have for it is just sticking your head in the sand. If you aren't boycotting Nestlé, you're supporting them.

    The "good" news is that there is no ethical consumption under Capitalism. You individually cannot do much, except protect, organize, and try your best to support less unethical companies whenever you can. However, to blame developing countries for corporations knowingly brutally exploiting them and offering no alternative is absolutely baffling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)