I’m the chimney sweep now!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That's just your opinion. The fact is that those developing nations should have child labor laws in place, and proper enforcement of those laws to prevent children from being exploited. The blame belongs squarely on those who allow it, and I reject any personal responsibility for any of that because I have no control over the laws of any country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It is not my opinion that international corporations brutally exploit the third world, it's a fact. It is also not my opinion that Capitalism leads to this, the profit motive inevitably leads to it.

    You claiming that developing nations should just fight against international corporations brutally exploiting them and absolving yourself of any responsibility you have for it is just sticking your head in the sand. If you aren't boycotting Nestlé, you're supporting them.

    The "good" news is that there is no ethical consumption under Capitalism. You individually cannot do much, except protect, organize, and try your best to support less unethical companies whenever you can. However, to blame developing countries for corporations knowingly brutally exploiting them and offering no alternative is absolutely baffling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The "good" news is that there is no ethical consumption under Capitalism.

    Such an absurd thing to say. I’m sure you’ll win lots of hearts and minds with your absolutist take 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What a way to say absolutely nothing.

    If Capitalism is inherently exploitative, then there is no perfectly ethical form of it. Therefore, it should be replaced with a better system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Do you imagine there is a switch somewhere? Like, right now we’re “doing capitalism” and tomorrow we could flip the switch and do something else?

    Everything exists on a spectrum, and you won’t find anything like “pure” capitalism anywhere.

    Id also disagree with the premise of it being inherently exploitative, but that’s a different topic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    No, I don't think you can just turn on the Socialism, Communism, or Anarchism button and do those. That's Utopianism. However, the idea that radical restructuring of society must be done via painfully slow iterative changes is also absurd and Utopian.

    Capitalism is inherently exploitative, and that isn't a different topic. Complaining about me saying that there's no ethical consumption under Capitalism and yet saying you don't want to talk about why that's the case is just running away.

    Capitalism is a bunch of mini-dictators competing, when we could have democratic and Cooperative control of industry instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Seriously! I mean, what if we only exploit a little bit of others' labor? Isn't that ok?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Are you 14? You don't seem to understand how global trade works

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We get it, you're white.. relax

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments