▲ 2458 ▼ Here we go again (lemmus.org) submitted 3 years ago by jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 350 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] whileloop@lemmy.world 297 points 3 years ago (6 children) This is your hourly reminder that Brave is still Chromium and still contributes to Google's influence over internet standards. permalink fedilink source hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] amnesiacrobat@lemmy.world 168 points 3 years ago (5 children) Iirc Firefox and I think Safari are the only major non-chromium browsers. It makes me so sad because I remember Google’s “don’t be evil” days… man they left that behind permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] big_slap@lemmy.world 74 points 3 years ago they've lived long enough to become the bad guys permalink fedilink source parent [–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 3 years ago (1 child) Safari already has attestation, has for a while, so while its at least a different browser, it’s still part of the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 30 points 3 years ago (1 child) Interesting. I didn't know that. Safari is a piece of shit for other reasons too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Reygle@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago (1 child) Example reason why Safari is shit: It's Safari permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah. They selectively adopt web standards years later than the others and the mobile and iPad versions in some ways behave completely differently from desktop (and each other). If safari just acted like the other browsers, frontend web dev would be MUCH easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Depends on which standards, for some css functions like backdrop-filters and mix-blend-modes it was years ahead of Firefox, where some of those had to be activated through about:config. I‘m glad Firefox catchend up in the past few years though. Also WebKit accelerated HTML5 adoption a lot. Never had any major issues developing for Firefox, safari and chrome in the past few years though. It was quite a different story 10 years ago but nowadays 99% of the time, it works flawlessly between all major browsers for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies) [–] Fpsfrank85@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (10 children) Anyone saying about duck duck go? Iv been using that and seems good permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] julianh@lemm.ee 19 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Their browser is webkit on iOS since apple doesn't allow anything else on that platform. The mac version is also webkit. And the android version is - you guess it - blink, the engine used by chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Doesn’t allow anything else on that platform yet*. Apple should be dropping the webkit requirement pretty soon and google and mozilla are already working on ios ports of their engines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Source?? Very exciting if true. Haven't heard this before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Duckduckgo will stick with WebKit because they want to keep it native permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) What about Opera GX? The mobile and Desktop versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] MagneticFusion@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) Opera is fucking evil regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (9 children) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments load more comments (9 replies) [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago The more you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fl1ppyR34@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Still chromium underneath, just like the normal opera permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago :disintigrate.png: permalink fedilink source parent [–] festemmie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago chromium, and not even open source(from what i know) permalink fedilink source parent [–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago It is good for privacy, but quality of results has always felt a bit lacking to me permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (8 replies) [–] balderdash9@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago I'm thinking about switching to Librawolf for the privacy features permalink fedilink source parent [+] ShadedCosmos@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] adroidBalloon@lemmy.ml 54 points 3 years ago (5 children) the CEO is also a homophobic bigot and covid denier permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Digital_man@lemmy.one 26 points 3 years ago Had no idea! Thanks I’m getting off brave! permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheAlbacor@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago Thanks for pointing this out! I was already using Firefox, but after looking this up I found out that they also got rid of him for being homophobic. Firefox it is! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (3 replies) [–] Hobbes@startrek.website 8 points 3 years ago* The CEO also donated to Prop 8 in California and a number of other bigoted conservative things. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sci@feddit.nl 7 points 3 years ago also this: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/22/business/brave-brendan-eich-covid-19.html permalink fedilink source parent [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) This is your hourly reminder that default Firefox isn't that great for privacy thus librewolf exist permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies) load more comments (1 reply)
[–] amnesiacrobat@lemmy.world 168 points 3 years ago (5 children) Iirc Firefox and I think Safari are the only major non-chromium browsers. It makes me so sad because I remember Google’s “don’t be evil” days… man they left that behind permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] big_slap@lemmy.world 74 points 3 years ago they've lived long enough to become the bad guys permalink fedilink source parent [–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 3 years ago (1 child) Safari already has attestation, has for a while, so while its at least a different browser, it’s still part of the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 30 points 3 years ago (1 child) Interesting. I didn't know that. Safari is a piece of shit for other reasons too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Reygle@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago (1 child) Example reason why Safari is shit: It's Safari permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah. They selectively adopt web standards years later than the others and the mobile and iPad versions in some ways behave completely differently from desktop (and each other). If safari just acted like the other browsers, frontend web dev would be MUCH easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Depends on which standards, for some css functions like backdrop-filters and mix-blend-modes it was years ahead of Firefox, where some of those had to be activated through about:config. I‘m glad Firefox catchend up in the past few years though. Also WebKit accelerated HTML5 adoption a lot. Never had any major issues developing for Firefox, safari and chrome in the past few years though. It was quite a different story 10 years ago but nowadays 99% of the time, it works flawlessly between all major browsers for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies) [–] Fpsfrank85@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (10 children) Anyone saying about duck duck go? Iv been using that and seems good permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] julianh@lemm.ee 19 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Their browser is webkit on iOS since apple doesn't allow anything else on that platform. The mac version is also webkit. And the android version is - you guess it - blink, the engine used by chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Doesn’t allow anything else on that platform yet*. Apple should be dropping the webkit requirement pretty soon and google and mozilla are already working on ios ports of their engines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Source?? Very exciting if true. Haven't heard this before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Duckduckgo will stick with WebKit because they want to keep it native permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) What about Opera GX? The mobile and Desktop versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] MagneticFusion@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) Opera is fucking evil regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (9 children) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments load more comments (9 replies) [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago The more you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fl1ppyR34@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Still chromium underneath, just like the normal opera permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago :disintigrate.png: permalink fedilink source parent [–] festemmie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago chromium, and not even open source(from what i know) permalink fedilink source parent [–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago It is good for privacy, but quality of results has always felt a bit lacking to me permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (8 replies) [–] balderdash9@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago I'm thinking about switching to Librawolf for the privacy features permalink fedilink source parent [+] ShadedCosmos@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 74 points 3 years ago they've lived long enough to become the bad guys permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 3 years ago (1 child) Safari already has attestation, has for a while, so while its at least a different browser, it’s still part of the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 30 points 3 years ago (1 child) Interesting. I didn't know that. Safari is a piece of shit for other reasons too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Reygle@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago (1 child) Example reason why Safari is shit: It's Safari permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah. They selectively adopt web standards years later than the others and the mobile and iPad versions in some ways behave completely differently from desktop (and each other). If safari just acted like the other browsers, frontend web dev would be MUCH easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Depends on which standards, for some css functions like backdrop-filters and mix-blend-modes it was years ahead of Firefox, where some of those had to be activated through about:config. I‘m glad Firefox catchend up in the past few years though. Also WebKit accelerated HTML5 adoption a lot. Never had any major issues developing for Firefox, safari and chrome in the past few years though. It was quite a different story 10 years ago but nowadays 99% of the time, it works flawlessly between all major browsers for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 30 points 3 years ago (1 child) Interesting. I didn't know that. Safari is a piece of shit for other reasons too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Reygle@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago (1 child) Example reason why Safari is shit: It's Safari permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah. They selectively adopt web standards years later than the others and the mobile and iPad versions in some ways behave completely differently from desktop (and each other). If safari just acted like the other browsers, frontend web dev would be MUCH easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Depends on which standards, for some css functions like backdrop-filters and mix-blend-modes it was years ahead of Firefox, where some of those had to be activated through about:config. I‘m glad Firefox catchend up in the past few years though. Also WebKit accelerated HTML5 adoption a lot. Never had any major issues developing for Firefox, safari and chrome in the past few years though. It was quite a different story 10 years ago but nowadays 99% of the time, it works flawlessly between all major browsers for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago (1 child) Example reason why Safari is shit: It's Safari permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah. They selectively adopt web standards years later than the others and the mobile and iPad versions in some ways behave completely differently from desktop (and each other). If safari just acted like the other browsers, frontend web dev would be MUCH easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Depends on which standards, for some css functions like backdrop-filters and mix-blend-modes it was years ahead of Firefox, where some of those had to be activated through about:config. I‘m glad Firefox catchend up in the past few years though. Also WebKit accelerated HTML5 adoption a lot. Never had any major issues developing for Firefox, safari and chrome in the past few years though. It was quite a different story 10 years ago but nowadays 99% of the time, it works flawlessly between all major browsers for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah. They selectively adopt web standards years later than the others and the mobile and iPad versions in some ways behave completely differently from desktop (and each other). If safari just acted like the other browsers, frontend web dev would be MUCH easier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Depends on which standards, for some css functions like backdrop-filters and mix-blend-modes it was years ahead of Firefox, where some of those had to be activated through about:config. I‘m glad Firefox catchend up in the past few years though. Also WebKit accelerated HTML5 adoption a lot. Never had any major issues developing for Firefox, safari and chrome in the past few years though. It was quite a different story 10 years ago but nowadays 99% of the time, it works flawlessly between all major browsers for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Depends on which standards, for some css functions like backdrop-filters and mix-blend-modes it was years ahead of Firefox, where some of those had to be activated through about:config. I‘m glad Firefox catchend up in the past few years though. Also WebKit accelerated HTML5 adoption a lot. Never had any major issues developing for Firefox, safari and chrome in the past few years though. It was quite a different story 10 years ago but nowadays 99% of the time, it works flawlessly between all major browsers for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fpsfrank85@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (10 children) Anyone saying about duck duck go? Iv been using that and seems good permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] julianh@lemm.ee 19 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Their browser is webkit on iOS since apple doesn't allow anything else on that platform. The mac version is also webkit. And the android version is - you guess it - blink, the engine used by chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Doesn’t allow anything else on that platform yet*. Apple should be dropping the webkit requirement pretty soon and google and mozilla are already working on ios ports of their engines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Source?? Very exciting if true. Haven't heard this before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Duckduckgo will stick with WebKit because they want to keep it native permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) What about Opera GX? The mobile and Desktop versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] MagneticFusion@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) Opera is fucking evil regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (9 children) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments load more comments (9 replies) [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago The more you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fl1ppyR34@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Still chromium underneath, just like the normal opera permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago :disintigrate.png: permalink fedilink source parent [–] festemmie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago chromium, and not even open source(from what i know) permalink fedilink source parent [–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago It is good for privacy, but quality of results has always felt a bit lacking to me permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (8 replies)
[–] julianh@lemm.ee 19 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Their browser is webkit on iOS since apple doesn't allow anything else on that platform. The mac version is also webkit. And the android version is - you guess it - blink, the engine used by chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Doesn’t allow anything else on that platform yet*. Apple should be dropping the webkit requirement pretty soon and google and mozilla are already working on ios ports of their engines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Source?? Very exciting if true. Haven't heard this before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Duckduckgo will stick with WebKit because they want to keep it native permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) What about Opera GX? The mobile and Desktop versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] MagneticFusion@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) Opera is fucking evil regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (9 children) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments load more comments (9 replies) [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago The more you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fl1ppyR34@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Still chromium underneath, just like the normal opera permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago :disintigrate.png: permalink fedilink source parent [–] festemmie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago chromium, and not even open source(from what i know) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] senoro@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Doesn’t allow anything else on that platform yet*. Apple should be dropping the webkit requirement pretty soon and google and mozilla are already working on ios ports of their engines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Source?? Very exciting if true. Haven't heard this before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Duckduckgo will stick with WebKit because they want to keep it native permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Source?? Very exciting if true. Haven't heard this before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Duckduckgo will stick with WebKit because they want to keep it native permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) What about Opera GX? The mobile and Desktop versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] MagneticFusion@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) Opera is fucking evil regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (9 children) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments load more comments (9 replies) [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago The more you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fl1ppyR34@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Still chromium underneath, just like the normal opera permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago :disintigrate.png: permalink fedilink source parent [–] festemmie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago chromium, and not even open source(from what i know) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) Opera is fucking evil regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (9 children) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments load more comments (9 replies) [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago The more you know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (9 children) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Fl1ppyR34@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Still chromium underneath, just like the normal opera permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago :disintigrate.png: permalink fedilink source parent
[–] festemmie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago chromium, and not even open source(from what i know) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago It is good for privacy, but quality of results has always felt a bit lacking to me permalink fedilink source parent
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago I'm thinking about switching to Librawolf for the privacy features permalink fedilink source parent
[–] adroidBalloon@lemmy.ml 54 points 3 years ago (5 children) the CEO is also a homophobic bigot and covid denier permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Digital_man@lemmy.one 26 points 3 years ago Had no idea! Thanks I’m getting off brave! permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheAlbacor@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago Thanks for pointing this out! I was already using Firefox, but after looking this up I found out that they also got rid of him for being homophobic. Firefox it is! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Digital_man@lemmy.one 26 points 3 years ago Had no idea! Thanks I’m getting off brave! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheAlbacor@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago Thanks for pointing this out! I was already using Firefox, but after looking this up I found out that they also got rid of him for being homophobic. Firefox it is! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 8 points 3 years ago* The CEO also donated to Prop 8 in California and a number of other bigoted conservative things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sci@feddit.nl 7 points 3 years ago also this: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/22/business/brave-brendan-eich-covid-19.html permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) This is your hourly reminder that default Firefox isn't that great for privacy thus librewolf exist permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments load more comments (2 replies)
