you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Vivaldi isn't just the spiritual successor, it's built by the guy who made the original Opera. Its baked in Ad and Tracker blocking rival UBO and it has all the features Fox can only hope to barely emulate with Mozilla extensions.

    I've got FF loaded up and set up how I like, but I won't be switching over until Vivaldi doesn't perform correctly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

    How do you know it's dependent? Cant anyone make a fork of the engine?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output.

    "Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments