▲ 2458 ▼ Here we go again (lemmus.org) submitted 3 years ago by jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 350 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Fpsfrank85@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (4 children) Anyone saying about duck duck go? Iv been using that and seems good permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] julianh@lemm.ee 19 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Their browser is webkit on iOS since apple doesn't allow anything else on that platform. The mac version is also webkit. And the android version is - you guess it - blink, the engine used by chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Doesn’t allow anything else on that platform yet*. Apple should be dropping the webkit requirement pretty soon and google and mozilla are already working on ios ports of their engines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Source?? Very exciting if true. Haven't heard this before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Duckduckgo will stick with WebKit because they want to keep it native permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) What about Opera GX? The mobile and Desktop versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] MagneticFusion@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) Opera is fucking evil regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Vivaldi isn't just the spiritual successor, it's built by the guy who made the original Opera. Its baked in Ad and Tracker blocking rival UBO and it has all the features Fox can only hope to barely emulate with Mozilla extensions. I've got FF loaded up and set up how I like, but I won't be switching over until Vivaldi doesn't perform correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Hah you beat me to it. That's why I said "spiritual," because it's still Chromium under the hood. permalink fedilink source parent [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) How do you know it's dependent? Cant anyone make a fork of the engine? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output. "Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago The more you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fl1ppyR34@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Still chromium underneath, just like the normal opera permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago :disintigrate.png: permalink fedilink source parent [–] festemmie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago chromium, and not even open source(from what i know) permalink fedilink source parent [–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago It is good for privacy, but quality of results has always felt a bit lacking to me permalink fedilink source parent [–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) I believe duck duck go sources their results from Google somehow. For whatever that's worth permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) DDG aggregates from Yahoo afaik. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) And I thought yahoo got it's results from Google too... I probably have no idea though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is what DDG has to say about where their results come from: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/ Spoiler alert: It's not Google or Yahoo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Interesting. And Wikipedia says yahoo gets it's search data from Bing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Search permalink fedilink source parent [–] raunchy_noodles@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That’s a search engine, chrome and Firefox are the browser. You can use duck duck go from either. I haven’t heard anything negative about them yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fpsfrank85@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) I have the duck duck app on my phone, wasn’t sure if it was any different permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] raunchy_noodles@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago I just looked it up and you’re right. Looks like they have a browser out now. My mistake. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] julianh@lemm.ee 19 points 3 years ago* (2 children) Their browser is webkit on iOS since apple doesn't allow anything else on that platform. The mac version is also webkit. And the android version is - you guess it - blink, the engine used by chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Doesn’t allow anything else on that platform yet*. Apple should be dropping the webkit requirement pretty soon and google and mozilla are already working on ios ports of their engines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Source?? Very exciting if true. Haven't heard this before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Duckduckgo will stick with WebKit because they want to keep it native permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) What about Opera GX? The mobile and Desktop versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] MagneticFusion@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) Opera is fucking evil regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Vivaldi isn't just the spiritual successor, it's built by the guy who made the original Opera. Its baked in Ad and Tracker blocking rival UBO and it has all the features Fox can only hope to barely emulate with Mozilla extensions. I've got FF loaded up and set up how I like, but I won't be switching over until Vivaldi doesn't perform correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Hah you beat me to it. That's why I said "spiritual," because it's still Chromium under the hood. permalink fedilink source parent [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) How do you know it's dependent? Cant anyone make a fork of the engine? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output. "Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago The more you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fl1ppyR34@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Still chromium underneath, just like the normal opera permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago :disintigrate.png: permalink fedilink source parent [–] festemmie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago chromium, and not even open source(from what i know) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] senoro@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Doesn’t allow anything else on that platform yet*. Apple should be dropping the webkit requirement pretty soon and google and mozilla are already working on ios ports of their engines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Source?? Very exciting if true. Haven't heard this before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Duckduckgo will stick with WebKit because they want to keep it native permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Source?? Very exciting if true. Haven't heard this before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] senoro@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://9to5mac.com/2023/02/07/new-iphone-browsers/ I think i heard a more definitive source as well since this one is a few months old that it should be coming with ios17. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I just googled and found that. Only problem is that it's been 6 months and not a peep since. This is more of a policy piece than software (I think). Any reason why that capability would be tied to an os release? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] senoro@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Apple like to link updates to policy and software to ios updates when they could easily be added anytime. It’s just a thing they do. Maybe so they can tote it as a new feature for developers coming with ios 17 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 3 years ago Makes sense. Thanks for your responses! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Duckduckgo will stick with WebKit because they want to keep it native permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) What about Opera GX? The mobile and Desktop versions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] MagneticFusion@lemm.ee 13 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) Opera is fucking evil regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Vivaldi isn't just the spiritual successor, it's built by the guy who made the original Opera. Its baked in Ad and Tracker blocking rival UBO and it has all the features Fox can only hope to barely emulate with Mozilla extensions. I've got FF loaded up and set up how I like, but I won't be switching over until Vivaldi doesn't perform correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Hah you beat me to it. That's why I said "spiritual," because it's still Chromium under the hood. permalink fedilink source parent [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) How do you know it's dependent? Cant anyone make a fork of the engine? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output. "Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago The more you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fl1ppyR34@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Still chromium underneath, just like the normal opera permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago :disintigrate.png: permalink fedilink source parent [–] festemmie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago chromium, and not even open source(from what i know) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) Opera is fucking evil regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Vivaldi isn't just the spiritual successor, it's built by the guy who made the original Opera. Its baked in Ad and Tracker blocking rival UBO and it has all the features Fox can only hope to barely emulate with Mozilla extensions. I've got FF loaded up and set up how I like, but I won't be switching over until Vivaldi doesn't perform correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Hah you beat me to it. That's why I said "spiritual," because it's still Chromium under the hood. permalink fedilink source parent [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) How do you know it's dependent? Cant anyone make a fork of the engine? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output. "Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago The more you know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] danielton@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) The enshittification of Opera sucks... I used to like them when they had their own Presto rendering engine. I heard Vivaldi is the spiritual successor, but it, too, is based on Chromium. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Vivaldi isn't just the spiritual successor, it's built by the guy who made the original Opera. Its baked in Ad and Tracker blocking rival UBO and it has all the features Fox can only hope to barely emulate with Mozilla extensions. I've got FF loaded up and set up how I like, but I won't be switching over until Vivaldi doesn't perform correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Hah you beat me to it. That's why I said "spiritual," because it's still Chromium under the hood. permalink fedilink source parent [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) How do you know it's dependent? Cant anyone make a fork of the engine? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output. "Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Vivaldi isn't just the spiritual successor, it's built by the guy who made the original Opera. Its baked in Ad and Tracker blocking rival UBO and it has all the features Fox can only hope to barely emulate with Mozilla extensions. I've got FF loaded up and set up how I like, but I won't be switching over until Vivaldi doesn't perform correctly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Hah you beat me to it. That's why I said "spiritual," because it's still Chromium under the hood. permalink fedilink source parent [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) How do you know it's dependent? Cant anyone make a fork of the engine? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output. "Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] westyvw@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] danielton@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Hah you beat me to it. That's why I said "spiritual," because it's still Chromium under the hood. permalink fedilink source parent [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) How do you know it's dependent? Cant anyone make a fork of the engine? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output. "Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] danielton@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Hah you beat me to it. That's why I said "spiritual," because it's still Chromium under the hood. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) How do you know it's dependent? Cant anyone make a fork of the engine? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output. "Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output. "Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output. "Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I'm just a network engineer I don't know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] westyvw@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fl1ppyR34@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) Still chromium underneath, just like the normal opera permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago :disintigrate.png: permalink fedilink source parent
[–] festemmie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago chromium, and not even open source(from what i know) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago It is good for privacy, but quality of results has always felt a bit lacking to me permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) I believe duck duck go sources their results from Google somehow. For whatever that's worth permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) DDG aggregates from Yahoo afaik. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) And I thought yahoo got it's results from Google too... I probably have no idea though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is what DDG has to say about where their results come from: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/ Spoiler alert: It's not Google or Yahoo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Interesting. And Wikipedia says yahoo gets it's search data from Bing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Search permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) DDG aggregates from Yahoo afaik. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) And I thought yahoo got it's results from Google too... I probably have no idea though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is what DDG has to say about where their results come from: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/ Spoiler alert: It's not Google or Yahoo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Interesting. And Wikipedia says yahoo gets it's search data from Bing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Search permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) And I thought yahoo got it's results from Google too... I probably have no idea though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is what DDG has to say about where their results come from: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/ Spoiler alert: It's not Google or Yahoo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Interesting. And Wikipedia says yahoo gets it's search data from Bing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Search permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is what DDG has to say about where their results come from: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/ Spoiler alert: It's not Google or Yahoo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Interesting. And Wikipedia says yahoo gets it's search data from Bing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Search permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Interesting. And Wikipedia says yahoo gets it's search data from Bing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Search permalink fedilink source parent
[–] raunchy_noodles@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That’s a search engine, chrome and Firefox are the browser. You can use duck duck go from either. I haven’t heard anything negative about them yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fpsfrank85@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) I have the duck duck app on my phone, wasn’t sure if it was any different permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] raunchy_noodles@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago I just looked it up and you’re right. Looks like they have a browser out now. My mistake. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fpsfrank85@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) I have the duck duck app on my phone, wasn’t sure if it was any different permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] raunchy_noodles@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago I just looked it up and you’re right. Looks like they have a browser out now. My mistake. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] raunchy_noodles@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago I just looked it up and you’re right. Looks like they have a browser out now. My mistake. permalink fedilink source parent
