you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 2 years ago (3 children)

At the end of the article:

Younger firms and CEOs also tend to be more enthusiastic about hybrid work arrangements, meaning they’ll get more popular over time as existing business heads retire, he added.

So don't worry, those fragile ego managers will die out over time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    I don’t want hybrid, I want full remote. Hybrid means I still have to live in a stupid expensive city to have a decent job. Full remote means I can go live where I want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I was on hybrid. I hated it. I was so much more productive at home where I could be comfortable and distraction-free. If you want work friends, fine. Go to the office. Never again for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    My employer went fully WFH for their engineering/tech teams just before the pandemic. Our CEO specifically stated the desire was to hire the best engineering talent no matter where in the world they were, and not make anybody feel left out.

    In roughly the last year or so they have encouraged employees who live less than an hour away from an office to come in a couple times a month. So I guess that technically we’re hybrid as well now. But they again made it clear that it’s only if it’s within a reasonable distance.

    I personally haven’t set foot in one of our offices since 2019. The office closest to me is 2+ hours away in another state. I have coworkers on my team that would have 6+ hour drives. And then there are employees living in other countries throughout Europe & Asia who certainly aren’t going to commute to our Berlin office…

    Hybrid is perfectly fine as long as the employer doesn’t try to blindly force it on everybody without exception.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah, no.

    Narcissists and antisocial types have weaseled their way into positions of power since time immemorial.

    They will continue to do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I don't understand why this got downvotes, there is even research supporting this.

    edit: Maybe it's the common misunderstanding of what it means to be "antisocial" in psychology? Many are still not aware it has nothing to do with keeping to yourself or other socially neutral behaviours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments