▲ 356 ▼ Return to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s why (www.cnbc.com) submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world 57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, no. Narcissists and antisocial types have weaseled their way into positions of power since time immemorial. They will continue to do so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I don't understand why this got downvotes, there is even research supporting this. edit: Maybe it's the common misunderstanding of what it means to be "antisocial" in psychology? Many are still not aware it has nothing to do with keeping to yourself or other socially neutral behaviours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teft@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago There’s always a few downvoters in each thread downvoting innocuous comments. Luckily the points are made up and the votes don’t matter. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I don't understand why this got downvotes, there is even research supporting this. edit: Maybe it's the common misunderstanding of what it means to be "antisocial" in psychology? Many are still not aware it has nothing to do with keeping to yourself or other socially neutral behaviours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teft@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago There’s always a few downvoters in each thread downvoting innocuous comments. Luckily the points are made up and the votes don’t matter. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teft@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago There’s always a few downvoters in each thread downvoting innocuous comments. Luckily the points are made up and the votes don’t matter. permalink fedilink source parent