Her existence in the classroom promotes it as a viable career.

Her need for a second source of income suggests teaching is not a viable career.

If you really don't want teachers doing sex work on the side, you could just pay them enough to not need a second job in the first place.

Her existence as a teacher is tacit approval of her side gig by the school. Her existence in the classroom promotes it as a viable career.

Source?

Seems to be a viable career, if she can charge a $3000 cancellation fee…

I love how you admit to “using” prostitutes, because you don’t seem to view them as human beings. Seems like what’s good for the gander isn’t good for the goose.

Her getting fired means she'll likely have to rely more on her prostitution to survive. This means the school has now increased the amount of prostitution. How are the schools against it if that's the case? Maybe the schools should increase teachers wages so that they don't need to be a prostitute.

and I wouldn’t want a drug dealer teaching chemistry,

Of course not. Why would you assume a salesperson be good at teaching manufacturing of what they sell?

You make it sound like she's doing it for fun

Her existence as a teacher is tacit approval of her side gig by the school. Her existence in the classroom promotes it as a viable career.

The logic of your argument follows that teaching as a career itself shouldn't be presented as a viable career is it requires a second job to finance the career of teaching.

Pretty telling to see which response(s) you've ignored.

What a useless word soup. Sex can absolutely be transactional if it suits two consenting parties. Your world view being as narrow as a drinking straw isn't a basis for how the rest of society chooses to live.

Yeah, before neoliberalism prostitution didn't exist, so clearly it is good to victimize prostitutes, as that's just sticking it to neoliberals, the ones who invented prostitution.

Do you think sex ed somehow cheapens sex? People understanding sex only makes it better for everyone in every way.

There is nothing about sex ed that teaches anyone that sex is a commodity. My experience in public school was there was no morality involved whatsoever. It was very sterile and 100% about learning technical shit about how our bodies work. Invaluable information, I might add.

And I grew up in what many would consider a liberal area, especially in terms of our local public education.

Freaks like you who are obsessed with which genitals a child has, are incapable of separating the physiological aspects of sex from the emotional ones. Sex ed is not sexy, dude, it was awkward as fuck. If anything, it turned me off of sex.

It's like saying that learning about the chemical processes used to make meth in chemistry class is the same thing as smoking it.