▲ 1073 ▼ They use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust. (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Daft_ish@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world 330 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Damaskox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) It seems that this decentralized style starts to be a new trend? First this Fediverse/Lemmy I heard about. Then The Matrix (messaging platform). And now these Mastodon & WreMin. Well, if that prevents or slows down the corrupted law of enshittification, then I'm approving it! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) is wiremin using activitypub? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Damaskox@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I don't know myself. I just heard about it. Haven't studied it at all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zink@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A fediverse decentralized Wikipedia substitute would be interesting for sure. Wikipedia’s massive head start is pretty strong though. With Lemmy, I don’t care if a post has 100 comments while the same article on Reddit has 10,000. The comments here are better anyway. But if a Fedipedia has 1/100 the subjects covered that Wikipedia does, that makes it less useful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Damaskox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yup...no matter how good a tool is, if there are no users to it, it might be as good as it never existed (unless if someone takes ideas from said tool and implements them to a user service, growing their quality, which is still better than nothing). Sad but true. permalink fedilink source parent [+] h_a_r_u_k_i@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) is wiremin using activitypub? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Damaskox@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I don't know myself. I just heard about it. Haven't studied it at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Damaskox@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I don't know myself. I just heard about it. Haven't studied it at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) A fediverse decentralized Wikipedia substitute would be interesting for sure. Wikipedia’s massive head start is pretty strong though. With Lemmy, I don’t care if a post has 100 comments while the same article on Reddit has 10,000. The comments here are better anyway. But if a Fedipedia has 1/100 the subjects covered that Wikipedia does, that makes it less useful. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Damaskox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yup...no matter how good a tool is, if there are no users to it, it might be as good as it never existed (unless if someone takes ideas from said tool and implements them to a user service, growing their quality, which is still better than nothing). Sad but true. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Damaskox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yup...no matter how good a tool is, if there are no users to it, it might be as good as it never existed (unless if someone takes ideas from said tool and implements them to a user service, growing their quality, which is still better than nothing). Sad but true. permalink fedilink source parent