In this particular case, I can't imagine they'd tell him that with any frequency that might at all be considered "often."

EDIT: to be clear by "they" I meant experts, not AI.

Not only effort, but money.

There's also the possibility that an actual expert will tell you stuff you don't want to hear. GPT will lead you down whatever path you're already on like a hotdog hanging from a stick leads a dog.

There used to be whole ass boards appointments for this, like usa had the Office of Technology Assessment working for Congress, where they paid various experts from various fields to come in and review stuff and give advice.

A senator could get an actual expert on a phone call in minutes if they wanted. Fucking no-name YouTubers are able to talk to experts all the time. It’s not hard! But I am guessing you are more referring to the dinners part. It really needs to be illegal to give elected officials anything.

It's a mix, but yes. The oil companies are very interested in making sure the "experts" are theirs.

ChatGPT might be better, depending on how often he "corrects" it.

Also a future issue of how much influence these companies have. I hear NYT is already targeting ads at AI.

or giving them free escorts, who became the first lady.

I was thinking the same thing, he might actually be learning something

You’re right that it’s nowhere near 100% like I suggested. But ya, I wear that bias with pride.